Comparison of the Accuracy of CT Volume Calculated by Circumscription to Prolate Ellipsoid Volume (Bidimensional Measurement Multiplied by Coronal Long Axis)

被引:21
作者
Rkein, Ali M.
Harrigal, Chivonne [1 ]
Friedman, Arnold C. [1 ]
Persky, Daniel [2 ]
Krupinski, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Oncol, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2008.08.013
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. Tumor volume is one of the most important factors in evaluating the response to treatment of patients with cancer. The objective of this study was to compare Computed tomographic (CT) Volume Calculation using a semiautomated circumscribing tracing tool (manual circumscription [MC]) to prolate ellipsoid volume calculation (PEVC; bidimensional measurement multiplied by coronal long axis) and determine which was more accurate and consistent. Materials and Methods. The study included six patients with nine neoplasms, six phantoms, and two radiologists. The neoplasms and phantoms of varying sizes and shapes were imaged Using multidetector CT scanners, with slice thicknesses ranging from 0.5 to 3 mm. Measurements were performed using a TeraRecon 3D workstation. Each lesion and phantom was manually circumscribed, and its three dimensions were measured. The measurements were repeated 2 weeks later. Results. MC of the phantoms deviated from their true volumes by an average of 3.0 +/- 1 %, whereas PEVC deviated by 10.1 +/- 3.99%. MC interobserver readings varied by 1.2 +/- 0.6% and PEVC by 4.9 +/- 3.3%. MC intraobserver readings varied by 1.95 +/- 1.75% and PEVC by 2.5 +/- 1.55%. Patient tumor volume predicted by Wand PEVC varied greatly; MC interobserver readings differed by 3.3 +/- 2.1 % and PEVC by 20.1 +/- 10.6%. MC intraobserver readings varied by 2.5 +/- 1.9%, and PEVC by 5.5 +/- 3.2%. Variability was greater for complex shapes than for simple shapes. Bidimensional analysis demonstrated an interobserver difference of 12.1 +/- 8.7% and an intraobserver difference of 5.05 +/- 3.3%. These results demonstrate large interobserver and intraobserver variability. Variability was greater for complex shapes than for simple shapes. Conclusion. MC of neoplasms provided more accurate and consistent Volume predictions than PEVC. More complicated shapes demonstrated the Superiority of MC over PEVC.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 186
页数:6
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Interobserver-variability of lung nodule volumetry considering different segmentation algorithms and observer training levels
    Bolte, H.
    Jahnke, T.
    Schaefer, F. K. W.
    Wenke, R.
    Hoffmann, B.
    Freitag-Wolf, S.
    Dicken, V.
    Kuhnigk, J. M.
    Lohmann, J.
    Voss, S.
    Knoess, N.
    Heller, M.
    Biederer, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 64 (02) : 285 - 295
  • [2] Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma
    Cheson, Bruce D.
    Pfistner, Beate
    Juweid, Malik E.
    Gascoyne, Randy D.
    Specht, Lena
    Horning, Sandra J.
    Coiffier, Bertrand
    Fisher, Richard I.
    Hagenbeek, Anton
    Zucca, Emanuele
    Rosen, Steven T.
    Stroobants, Sigrid
    Lister, T. Andrew
    Hoppe, Richard T.
    Dreyling, Martin
    Tobinai, Kensei
    Vose, Julie M.
    Connors, Joseph M.
    Federico, Massimo
    Diehl, Volker
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (05) : 579 - 586
  • [3] GURNEY JW, 2007, DOUBLING TIME
  • [4] Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: A statement from the Fleischner Society
    MacMahon, H
    Austin, JHM
    Gamsu, G
    Herold, CJ
    Jett, JR
    Naidich, DP
    Patz, EF
    Swensen, SJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (02) : 395 - 400