How to Assess Quality of Research in Iran, From Input to Impact? Introduction of Peer-Based Research Evaluation Model in Iran

被引：0

作者：

Ebadifar, Asghar ^{[1
,2
]}

Eftekhari, Monir Baradaran ^{[1
]}

Owlia, Parviz ^{[3
]}

Habibi, Elham ^{[1
]}

Ghalenoee, Elham ^{[1
]}

Bagheri, Mohammad Reza ^{[1
]}

Falahat, Katayoun ^{[1
]}

Eltemasi, Masoumeh ^{[1
]}

Sobhani, Zahra ^{[1
]}

Akhondzadeh, Shahin ^{[1
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Minist Hlth & Med Educ, Res & Technol, 13th Floor,Block A, Tehran, Iran

[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dent Sch, Dentofacial Deform Res Ctr, Res Inst Dent Sci,Dept Orthodont, Tehran, Iran

[3] Shahed Univ, Fac Med, MMRC, Tehran, Iran

[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Psychiat Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran

来源：

ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE | 2017年 / 20卷 / 11期

关键词：

Evaluation; Iran; Peer review; Qualitative; Research; SCIENCE;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Background: Research evaluation is a systematic and objective process to measure relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of research activities, and peer review is one of the most important tools for assessing quality of research. The aim of this study was introducing research evaluation indicators based on peer reviewing. Methods: This study was implemented in 4 stages. A list of objective-oriented evaluation indicators were designed in 4 axes, including; governance and leadership, structure, knowledge production and research impact. Results: The top 10% medical sciences research centers (RCs) were evaluated based on peer review. Adequate equipment and laboratory instruments, high quality research publication and national or international cooperation were the main strengths in medical sciences RCs and the most important weaknesses included failure to adhere to strategic plans, parallel actions in similar fields, problems in manpower recruitment, knowledge translation & exchange (KTE) in service providers and policy makers' levels. Conclusion: Peer review evaluation can improve the quality of research.

引用

页码：680 / 685

页数：6

共 15 条

[1]

De Silva PUK, 2017, FASCINAT LIFE SCI, P73, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-50627-2_6

[2]

Djalalinia S, 2012, IRAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V41, P39

[3]

Djalalinia S, 2017, INT J PREVENTIVE MED, V8, DOI 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_362_16

[4]

Godlee Fiona., 2003, PEER REV HLTH SCI

[5]

Gyles C, 2014, CAN VET J, V55, P109

[6] Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland [J].

Kulczycki, Emanuel ;

Rozkosz, Ewa A. .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 111 (01) :417-442

[7] Describing the impact of health research: a Research Impact Framework [J].

Kuruvilla, Shyama ;

Mays, Nicholas ;

Pleasant, Andrew ;

Walt, Gill .

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 6 (1)

[8] STRENGTHENING MEDICAL ETHICS BY STRATEGIC PLANNING IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN [J].

Larijani, Bagher ;

Malek-Afzali, Hossein ;

Zahedi, Farzaneh ;

Motevaseli, Elaheh .

DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2006, 6 (02) :106-110

[9] The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster? [J].

Martin, Ben R. .

RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2011, 20 (03) :247-254

[10]

Massarrat S, 2011, ARCH IRAN MED, V14, P370, DOI 011146/AIM.003

← 1 2 →