CFD studies on the gas-liquid flow in the swirl generating device

被引:18
作者
Putra, Ryan Anugrah [1 ,3 ]
Schaefer, Thomas [1 ]
Neumann, Martin [2 ]
Lucas, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Inst Fluid Dynam, Bautzner Landstr 400, D-01328 Dresden, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, AREVA Endowed Chair Imaging Tech Energy & Proc En, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[3] Gadjah Mada Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Fac Engn, Jalan Graf 2, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
关键词
Swirling flow; Multiphase flow; Inline separator; CFD simulation; Euler-Euler model; BUBBLE-INDUCED TURBULENCE; VOID FRACTION; 2-PHASE FLOW; MODELS; SIMULATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.03.034
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
In this work, CFD simulations using the Euler-Euler approach were performed to model the gas-liquid flow in a swirl-generating device. The computational work was based on experiments, which are conducted in a vertical pipe packed with a static swirl element. Measurements of gas volume fractions at several planes within the swirl element were taken using high-resolution gamma-ray computed tomography (HireCT). The simulations were carried out for the experimental conditions with defined inlet gas volumetric flow rates of 5 and 10%. The profile of several key parameters (e.g. pressure, liquid and gas velocities and gas fraction) are used to understand the flow behavior inside the device. The radial gas phase distribution obtained from the simulations assuming different mono-disperse and bi-modal bubble sizes is compared against the experimental results. The significant influence of the selected bubble sizes on the profile is shown and discussed within this paper. In general, the radial profile of gas fraction is well captured by the CFD simulations except in the transition zone where a significant discrepancy to the experiment is observed.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 225
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Computational fluid dynamics for engineers
[2]   ANALYSIS OF PHASE DISTRIBUTION IN FULLY-DEVELOPED LAMINAR BUBBLY 2-PHASE FLOW [J].
ANTAL, SP ;
LAHEY, RT ;
FLAHERTY, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 1991, 17 (05) :635-652
[3]   Prediction of void fraction for gas-liquid flow in horizontal, upward and downward inclined pipes using artificial neural network [J].
Azizi, Sadra ;
Ahmadloo, Ebrahim ;
Awad, Mohamed M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2016, 87 :35-44
[4]   Validation of high-resolution gamma-ray computed tomography for quantitative gas holdup measurements in centrifugal pumps [J].
Bieberle, Andre ;
Schaefer, Thomas ;
Neumann, Martin ;
Hampel, Uwe .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 26 (09)
[5]  
Burns A. D., 2004, ICMF2004
[6]   Experimental study and numerical optimization on a vane-type separator for bubble separation in TMSR [J].
Cai, Baowei ;
Wang, Jianjun ;
Sun, Licheng ;
Zhang, Nana ;
Yan, Changqi .
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2014, 74 :1-13
[7]   Investigation of Swirling Flows in Mixing Chambers [J].
Chen, Jyh Jian ;
Chen, Chun Huei .
MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN ENGINEERING, 2011, 2011
[8]  
Chin R. W., 2002, SOC PETROLEUM ENG
[9]  
Chin R. W., 2003, SOC PETROLEUM ENG
[10]   Fundamental understanding of swirling flow pattern in hydrocyclones [J].
Davailles, Aurelien ;
Climent, Eric ;
Bourgeois, Florent .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 92 :152-160