Structural equation modeling of risk-taking behaviors based on personality dimensions and risk power

被引:3
作者
Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei [1 ]
Taheri, Elnaz [4 ]
Najafi, Kamran [2 ]
Mollabahrami, Farzaneh [2 ]
Deyhim, Sajjad [2 ]
Farhadian, Maryam [3 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Ctr Excellence Occupat Hlth, Occupat Hlth & Safety Res Ctr, Dept Occupat Hlth Engn,Sch Publ Hlth, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Res Ctr Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Hamadan, Iran
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Partial least squares structural equation modeling; personality; risk power; risk-taking behavior; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.4103/iahs.iahs_10_20
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: Risk-taking behaviors in industries can be one of the essential reasons for unsafe behavior and incident. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interactions between risk-taking behaviors and personality dimensions and develop a model with partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Methodology: This cross-sectional analytical study was carried out on 96 participants in Hamadan in the west of Iran in 2016. Risk power and personality dimensions of individuals were evaluated using a questionnaire, and risk-taking behavior was also assessed using a balloon analog risk test. The data were modeled using PLS-SEM. Results: In females, the neuroticism dimension had a significant relationship with risk-taking behaviors (P < 0.001). Besides, in males, there was a significant relationship between risk-taking behaviors and extraversion (P < 0.001). Furthermore, people who were more inclined to social acceptance were more risk-averse and self-reported more risk-taking behaviors (P < 0.05). The results of this study showed that people with different personality dimensions have different risk-taking behaviors. Conclusion: Studying individuals and errors that may be committed, the system can be in a way that individuals' unsafe behaviors will reduce.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 125
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Power, optimism, and risk-taking
    Anderson, Cameron
    Galinsky, Adam D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 36 (04) : 511 - 536
  • [2] Azir S., 2010, SAFETY BEHAV MALAYSI
  • [3] Risky Business: Emotion, Decision-Making, and Addiction
    Antoine Bechara
    [J]. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2003, 19 (1) : 23 - 51
  • [4] Beecher SD, 2008, W PSYCH ASS ANN CONV
  • [5] Adolescent risk-taking is predicted by individual differences in cognitive control over emotional, but not non-emotional, response conflict
    Botdorf, Morgan
    Rosenbaum, Gail M.
    Patrianakos, Jamie
    Steinberg, Laurence
    Chein, Jason M.
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2017, 31 (05) : 972 - 979
  • [6] Complexity in risk elicitation may affect the conclusions: A demonstration using gender differences
    Charness, Gary
    Eckel, Catherine
    Gneezy, Uri
    Kajackaite, Agne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2018, 56 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [7] Chung JH, 2002, TRANSPORT RES REC, P87
  • [8] A psychological approach to occupational safety
    Clissold, Gemma
    Buttigieg, Donna M.
    De Cieri, Helen
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2012, 50 (01) : 92 - 109
  • [9] Emotion-Based Dispositions to Rash Action: Positive and Negative Urgency
    Cyders, Melissa A.
    Smith, Gregory T.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2008, 134 (06) : 807 - 828
  • [10] Development and Initial Validation of the Disinhibition Inventory A Multifaceted Measure of Disinhibition
    Dindo, Lilian
    McDade-Montez, Elizabeth
    Sharma, Leigh
    Watson, David
    Clark, Lee Anna
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2009, 16 (03) : 274 - 291