RETRACTED: SQUID-detected ultra-low field MRI (Retracted Article)

被引:34
作者
Espy, Michelle [1 ]
Matlashov, Andrei [1 ]
Volegov, Petr [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Ultra-low fields (ULFs); SQUID detection; ULF MRI; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; CONCOMITANT GRADIENTS; NEURONAL-ACTIVITY; MICROTESLA MRI; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; RELAXATION; NMR; INSTRUMENTATION; STIMULATION; PERFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmr.2013.02.009
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
MRI remains the premier method for non-invasive imaging of soft-tissue. Since the first demonstration of ULF MRI the trend has been towards ever higher magnetic fields. This is because the signal, and efficiency of Faraday detectors, increases with ever higher magnetic fields and corresponding Larmor frequencies. Nevertheless, there are many compelling reasons to continue to explore MRI at much weaker magnetic fields, the so-called ultra-low field or (ULF) regime. In the past decade many excellent proof-of-concept demonstrations of ULF MRI have been made. These include combined MRI and magnetoencephalography, imaging in the presence of metal, unique tissue contrast, and implementation in situations where a high magnetic field is simply impractical. These demonstrations have routinely used pulsed pre-polarization (at magnetic fields from similar to 10 to 100 mT) followed by read-out in a much weaker (1-100 mu T) magnetic fields using the ultra-sensitive Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) sensor. Even with pre-polarization and SQUID detection, ULF MRI suffers from many challenges associated with lower magnetization (i.e. signal) and inherently long acquisition times compared to conventional >1 T MRI. These are fundamental limitations imposed by the low measurement and gradient fields used. In this review article we discuss some of the techniques, potential applications, and inherent challenges of ULF MRI. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 141
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
[21]   Nuclear magnetic relaxation in water revisited [J].
Hartwig, Stefan ;
Voigt, Jens ;
Scheer, Hans-Juergen ;
Albrecht, Hans-Helge ;
Burghoff, Martin ;
Trahms, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 135 (05)
[22]  
Kayser C., ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL
[23]  
Kim S-G., PRINCIPLES FUNCTIONA
[24]   QUANTIFICATION OF RELATIVE CEREBRAL BLOOD-FLOW CHANGE BY FLOW-SENSITIVE ALTERNATING INVERSION-RECOVERY (FAIR) TECHNIQUE - APPLICATION TO FUNCTIONAL MAPPING [J].
KIM, SG .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (03) :293-301
[25]   DETERMINANTS OF PROTON RELAXATION RATES IN TISSUE [J].
KOENIG, SH ;
BROWN, RD .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1984, 1 (04) :437-449
[26]   Toward direct neural current imaging by resonant mechanisms at ultra-low field [J].
Kraus, R. H., Jr. ;
Volegov, P. ;
Matlachov, A. ;
Espy, M. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 39 (01) :310-317
[27]   MR PERFUSION STUDIES WITH T-1-WEIGHTED ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING [J].
KWONG, KK ;
CHESLER, DA ;
WEISSKOFF, RM ;
DONAHUE, KM ;
DAVIS, TL ;
OSTERGAARD, L ;
CAMPBELL, TA ;
ROSEN, BR .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (06) :878-887
[28]   SQUID-detected MRI at 132 μT with T1-weighted contrast established at 10 μT-300 mT [J].
Lee, SK ;
Mössle, M ;
Myers, W ;
Kelso, N ;
Trabesinger, AH ;
Pines, A ;
Clarke, J .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2005, 53 (01) :9-14
[29]  
Lopes da Silva F H, 1991, Brain Topogr, V4, P133, DOI 10.1007/BF01132770
[30]   All-planar SQUIDs and pickup coils for combined MEG and MRI [J].
Luomahaara, J. ;
Vesanen, P. T. ;
Penttila, J. ;
Nieminen, J. O. ;
Dabek, J. ;
Simola, J. ;
Kiviranta, M. ;
Gronberg, L. ;
Zevenhoven, C. J. ;
Ilmoniemi, R. J. ;
Hassel, J. .
SUPERCONDUCTOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 24 (07)