RETRACTED: SQUID-detected ultra-low field MRI (Retracted Article)

被引:34
作者
Espy, Michelle [1 ]
Matlashov, Andrei [1 ]
Volegov, Petr [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Ultra-low fields (ULFs); SQUID detection; ULF MRI; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; CONCOMITANT GRADIENTS; NEURONAL-ACTIVITY; MICROTESLA MRI; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; RELAXATION; NMR; INSTRUMENTATION; STIMULATION; PERFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmr.2013.02.009
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
MRI remains the premier method for non-invasive imaging of soft-tissue. Since the first demonstration of ULF MRI the trend has been towards ever higher magnetic fields. This is because the signal, and efficiency of Faraday detectors, increases with ever higher magnetic fields and corresponding Larmor frequencies. Nevertheless, there are many compelling reasons to continue to explore MRI at much weaker magnetic fields, the so-called ultra-low field or (ULF) regime. In the past decade many excellent proof-of-concept demonstrations of ULF MRI have been made. These include combined MRI and magnetoencephalography, imaging in the presence of metal, unique tissue contrast, and implementation in situations where a high magnetic field is simply impractical. These demonstrations have routinely used pulsed pre-polarization (at magnetic fields from similar to 10 to 100 mT) followed by read-out in a much weaker (1-100 mu T) magnetic fields using the ultra-sensitive Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) sensor. Even with pre-polarization and SQUID detection, ULF MRI suffers from many challenges associated with lower magnetization (i.e. signal) and inherently long acquisition times compared to conventional >1 T MRI. These are fundamental limitations imposed by the low measurement and gradient fields used. In this review article we discuss some of the techniques, potential applications, and inherent challenges of ULF MRI. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 141
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Co-registration of magnetoencephalography with magnetic resonance imaging using bite-bar-based fiducials and surface-matching
    Adjamian, P
    Barnes, GR
    Hillebrand, A
    Holliday, IE
    Singh, KD
    Furlong, PL
    Harrington, E
    Barclay, CW
    Route, PJG
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (03) : 691 - 698
  • [2] Delta Relaxation Enhanced MR: Improving Activation-Specificity of Molecular Probes through R1 Dispersion Imaging
    Alford, Jamu K.
    Rutt, Brian K.
    Scholl, Timothy J.
    Handler, William B.
    Chronik, Blaine A.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 61 (04) : 796 - 802
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, Criteria for Significant Risk Investigations of Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Devices
  • [4] Current-induced magnetic resonance phase imaging
    Bodurka, J
    Jesmanowicz, A
    Hyde, JS
    Xu, H
    Estkowski, L
    Li, SJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1999, 137 (01) : 265 - 271
  • [5] Toward direct mapping of neuronal activity: MRI detection of ultraweak, transient magnetic fields changes
    Bodurka, J
    Bandettini, PA
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 47 (06) : 1052 - 1058
  • [6] PHYSIOLOGICAL-EFFECTS OF FAST OSCILLATING MAGNETIC-FIELD GRADIENTS
    BUDINGER, TF
    FISCHER, H
    HENTSCHEL, D
    REINFELDER, HE
    SCHMITT, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1991, 15 (06) : 909 - 914
  • [7] Nuclear magnetic resonance in the nanoTesla range
    Burghoff, M
    Hartwig, S
    Trahms, L
    Bernarding, J
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2005, 87 (05)
  • [8] Measurements of T1-relaxation in ex vivo prostate tissue at 132 μT
    Busch, Sarah
    Hatridge, Michael
    Moessle, Michael
    Myers, Whittier
    Wong, Travis
    Mueck, Michael
    Chew, Kevin
    Kuchinsky, Kyle
    Simko, Jeffry
    Clarke, John
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2012, 67 (04) : 1138 - 1145
  • [9] SQUID-detected magnetic resonance imaging in microtesla fields
    Clarke, John
    Hatridge, Michael
    Moessle, Michael
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 9 : 389 - 413
  • [10] SENSORY STIMULATION BY TIME-VARYING MAGNETIC-FIELDS
    COHEN, MS
    WEISSKOFF, RM
    RZEDZIAN, RR
    KANTOR, HL
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1990, 14 (02) : 409 - 414