Two-dimensional sonographic placental measurements in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age infants

被引:36
|
作者
Schwartz, N. [1 ]
Wang, E. [1 ]
Parry, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Maternal & Child Hlth Res Program, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
biometry; fetal growth restriction; placenta; small-for-gestational age; ultrasound; 3-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND; GROWTH RESTRICTION; PLASMA-PROTEIN; 2ND TRIMESTER; 1ST TRIMESTER; PREGNANCY; VOLUME; DOPPLER; INSUFFICIENCY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/uog.11136
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the utility of two-dimensional (2D) sonographic placental measurements in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants. Methods The maximal diameter along the fetal surface of the placenta and the maximal placental thickness were measured at 1824 weeks' gestation, and the measurements repeated in the orthogonal plane. Biometric lags were calculated as the difference between sonographic gestational age, estimated using each of a number of fetal biometric measurements, and actual gestational age. These variables were analyzed individually and in combination as predictors of birth weight?<?10th percentile (SGA?<?10) and <?5th percentile (SGA?<?5). Results 1909 singleton pregnancies were included. Mean placental diameter (SGA?<?10, P?<?0.001; SGA?<?5, P?=?0.002) and thickness (SGA?<?10, P?<?0.006; SGA?<?5, P?=?0.065) were significantly smaller in SGA pregnancies. The biometric lags were greater in SGA pregnancies, the lag in abdominal circumference (AC) being the most predictive of SGA (P?<?0.0001). Multivariable models were significantly predictive of both SGA?<?10th percentile (area under the receiveroperating characteristics curve (AUC)?=?0.7404) and <?5th percentile (AUC?=?0.7204), the best fitting models including AC lag and mean placental diameter and thickness. Conclusions 2D placental measurements taken in mid-gestation are significantly associated with the incidence of SGA. Biometric lags can improve the predictive ability further. These easily obtained variables should be considered in future efforts to develop a clinically useful predictive model for adverse outcome of pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 679
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictive performance for placental dysfunction related stillbirth of the competing risks model for small-for-gestational-age fetuses
    Nicolaides, Kypros H.
    Papastefanou, Ioannis
    Syngelaki, Argyro
    Ashoor, Ghalia
    Akolekar, Ranjit
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 (09) : 1530 - 1537
  • [42] Could masking gestational age estimation during scanning improve detection of small-for-gestational-age fetuses? A controlled pre-post evaluation
    Rowley, Amanda
    Dyer, Ellen
    Scott, James G.
    Aiken, Catherine E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2019, 1 (03)
  • [43] Prenatal growth in symmetric and asymmetric small-for-gestational-age infants
    Vik, T
    Vatten, L
    Jacobsen, G
    Bakketeig, LS
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 48 (1-2) : 167 - 176
  • [44] Placental abnormalities associated with isolated single umbilical artery in small-for-gestational-age births
    Battarbee, Ashley N.
    Palatnik, Anna
    Ernst, Linda M.
    Grobman, William A.
    PLACENTA, 2017, 59 : 9 - 12
  • [45] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PLACENTAL BIOIVIARKERS PREDICTING SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL AGE INFANTS
    Ruchob, Rungnapa
    Rutherford, Julienne
    Bell, Aleeca
    PLACENTA, 2017, 57 : 328 - 329
  • [46] Uric acid levels in gestational hypertensive women predict preeclampsia and outcome of small-for-gestational-age infants
    Zhao, Xiaobo
    Frempong, Sophia Twum
    Duan, Tao
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (17) : 2825 - 2831
  • [47] Competing risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates from biophysical markers at 19 to 24 weeks' gestation
    Papastefanou, Ioannis
    Nowacka, Urszula
    Syngelaki, Argyro
    Mansukhani, Tanvi
    Karamanis, George
    Wright, David
    Nicolaides, Kypros H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 225 (05) : 530.e1 - 530.e19
  • [48] RAPID CALCULATION OF STANDARDIZED PLACENTAL VOLUME AT 11 TO 13 WEEKS AND THE PREDICTION OF SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL AGE BABIES
    Collins, Sally L.
    Stevenson, Gordon N.
    Noble, J. Alison
    Impey, Lawrence
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 39 (02) : 253 - 260
  • [49] High serum lead concentration in the first trimester is associated with an elevated risk of small-for-gestational-age infants
    Wang, Hua
    Li, Jun
    Hao, Jia-Hu
    Chen, Yuan-Hua
    Liu, Lu
    Yu, Zhen
    Fu, Lin
    Tao, Fang-Biao
    Xu, De-Xiang
    TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 332 : 75 - 80
  • [50] Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Ciobanu, A.
    Khan, N.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Akolekar, R.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 53 (06) : 761 - 768