Temporal and spatial patterns of soil water extraction and drought resistance among genotypes of a perennial C4 grass

被引:10
作者
Zhou, Yi [1 ]
Lambrides, Christopher J. [1 ]
Roche, Matthew B. [2 ]
Duff, Alan [2 ]
Fukai, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Dept Agr Fisheries & Forestry, Cleveland, Qld 4163, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
drought tolerance; green couch grass; turfgrass; water use; WARM-SEASON TURFGRASSES; GRAIN-SORGHUM; TALL FESCUE; SUBHUMID ENVIRONMENT; KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS; AVOIDANCE; RESPONSES; GROWTH; PLANT; BERMUDAGRASS;
D O I
10.1071/FP12270
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to investigate patterns of soil water extraction and drought resistance among genotypes of bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) a perennial C-4 grass. Four wild Australian ecotypes (1-1, 25a1, 40-1, and 81-1) and four cultivars (CT2, Grand Prix, Legend, and Wintergreen) were examined in field experiments with rainfall excluded to monitor soil water extraction at 30-190 cm depths. In the study we defined drought resistance as the ability to maintain green canopy cover under drought. The most drought resistant genotypes (40-1 and 25a1) maintained more green cover (55-85% vs 5-10%) during water deficit and extracted more soil water (120-160 mm vs 77-107 mm) than drought sensitive genotypes, especially at depths from 50 to 110 cm, though all genotypes extracted water to 190 cm. The maintenance of green cover and higher soil water extraction were associated with higher stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate and relative water content. For all genotypes, the pattern of water use as a percentage of total water use was similar across depth and time We propose the observed genetic variation was related to different root characteristics (root length density, hydraulic conductivity, root activity) although shoot sensitivity to drying soil cannot be ruled out.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 392
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [11] Rooting depth and soil water extraction patterns of different crops in a silty loam Haplustoll
    Dardanelli, JL
    Bachmeier, OA
    Sereno, R
    Gil, R
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1997, 54 (01) : 29 - 38
  • [12] Drought avoidance aspects and crop coefficients of Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue turfs in the semiarid west
    Ervin, EH
    Koski, AJ
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1998, 38 (03) : 788 - 795
  • [13] Fry J.D., 2004, APPL TURFGRASS SCI P
  • [14] Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice
    Gowda, Veeresh R. P.
    Henry, Amelia
    Yamauchi, Akira
    Shashidhar, H. E.
    Serraj, Rachid
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2011, 122 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [15] Association of water spectral indices with plant and soil water relations in contrasting wheat genotypes
    Gutierrez, Mario
    Reynolds, Matthew P.
    Klatt, Arthur R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2010, 61 (12) : 3291 - 3303
  • [16] DROUGHT AVOIDANCE MECHANISMS OF SELECTED BERMUDAGRASS GENOTYPES
    HAYS, KL
    BARBER, JF
    KENNA, MP
    MCCOLLUM, TG
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 1991, 26 (02) : 180 - 182
  • [17] Huang B., 1999, Journal of Crop Production, V2, P317
  • [18] Drought-resistance mechanisms of seven warm-season turfgrasses under surface soil drying .2. Root aspects
    Huang, B
    Duncan, RR
    Carrow, RN
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (06) : 1863 - 1869
  • [19] Isbell RF., 2002, The Australian Soil Classification System, DOI [10.1071/9781486304646, DOI 10.1071/9781486304646]
  • [20] Drought tolerance of tall fescue populations selected for high root/shoot ratios and summer survival
    Karcher, Douglas E.
    Richardson, Michael D.
    Hignight, Kenneth
    Rush, Debra
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2008, 48 (02) : 771 - 777