Temporal and spatial patterns of soil water extraction and drought resistance among genotypes of a perennial C4 grass

被引:10
作者
Zhou, Yi [1 ]
Lambrides, Christopher J. [1 ]
Roche, Matthew B. [2 ]
Duff, Alan [2 ]
Fukai, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Dept Agr Fisheries & Forestry, Cleveland, Qld 4163, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
drought tolerance; green couch grass; turfgrass; water use; WARM-SEASON TURFGRASSES; GRAIN-SORGHUM; TALL FESCUE; SUBHUMID ENVIRONMENT; KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS; AVOIDANCE; RESPONSES; GROWTH; PLANT; BERMUDAGRASS;
D O I
10.1071/FP12270
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to investigate patterns of soil water extraction and drought resistance among genotypes of bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) a perennial C-4 grass. Four wild Australian ecotypes (1-1, 25a1, 40-1, and 81-1) and four cultivars (CT2, Grand Prix, Legend, and Wintergreen) were examined in field experiments with rainfall excluded to monitor soil water extraction at 30-190 cm depths. In the study we defined drought resistance as the ability to maintain green canopy cover under drought. The most drought resistant genotypes (40-1 and 25a1) maintained more green cover (55-85% vs 5-10%) during water deficit and extracted more soil water (120-160 mm vs 77-107 mm) than drought sensitive genotypes, especially at depths from 50 to 110 cm, though all genotypes extracted water to 190 cm. The maintenance of green cover and higher soil water extraction were associated with higher stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate and relative water content. For all genotypes, the pattern of water use as a percentage of total water use was similar across depth and time We propose the observed genetic variation was related to different root characteristics (root length density, hydraulic conductivity, root activity) although shoot sensitivity to drying soil cannot be ruled out.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 392
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
  • [2] Baker H. G., 1975, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, V5, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000245
  • [3] Impacts of Altered Light Spectral Quality on Warm-Season Turfgrass Growth under Greenhouse Conditions
    Baldwin, Christian M.
    Liu, Haibo
    McCarty, Lambert B.
    Luo, Hong
    Wells, Christina E.
    Toler, Joe E.
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2009, 49 (04) : 1444 - 1453
  • [4] Beard J.B., 1973, Turfgrass: Science and culture
  • [5] Blum A, 2011, PLANT BREEDING FOR WATER-LIMITED ENVIRONMENTS, P11, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7491-4_2
  • [6] Growth responses and performance of Kentucky bluegrass under summer stress
    Bonos, SA
    Murphy, JA
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1999, 39 (03) : 770 - 774
  • [7] Carrow RN, 1996, CROP SCI, V36, P687, DOI [10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600030028x, 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600020026x]
  • [8] Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant
    Chaves, MM
    Maroco, JP
    Pereira, JS
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2003, 30 (03) : 239 - 264
  • [9] Physiological responses of argentine peanut varieties to water stress. Water uptake and water use efficiency
    Collino, DJ
    Dardanelli, JL
    Sereno, R
    Racca, RW
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2000, 68 (02) : 133 - 142
  • [10] An empirical model for root water uptake
    Dardanelli, JL
    Ritchie, JT
    Calmon, M
    Andriani, JM
    Collino, DJ
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2004, 87 (01) : 59 - 71