Prostate cancer grade downgrading at time of prostatectomy provides risk-stratification insight into future tumor behavior after prostatectomy

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Shu [1 ]
Russell, J. Ryan [1 ]
Drescher, Max [1 ]
Park, Ashley [1 ]
Legesse, Teklu [2 ]
Kundra, Vikas [3 ]
Tran, Phuoc T. [4 ]
Phelan, Michael [1 ]
Naslund, Michael [1 ]
Siddiqui, M. Minhaj [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Diagnost Radiol & Nucl Med, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[5] Vet Affairs Maryland Healthcare Syst, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
PROSTATE | 2022年 / 82卷 / 16期
关键词
biopsy; downgrading; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; risk stratification; GLEASON SCORE; BIOPSY; HETEROGENEITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24425
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Prostate biopsy (Bx) sampling-based diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) has well-described inaccuracy when compared against whole gland analysis upon prostatectomy. Although upgrading of PCa Grade Group (GG) is often described, the occurrence and prognostic implications of downgrading PCa GG at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) is less understood. Our objective was to evaluate whether downgrading PCa GG at the time of RP was associated with future tumor behavior. Methods The SEER database was searched from 2010 to 2017 and patients were included if they were assigned pathological grades on both Bx and RP specimen. Patients were stratified into Bx GG > RP GG and Bx GG <= RP GG groups, and tumor behavior after treatment was examined. Cox regression was used for the survival analysis. Results Here, 99,835 patients were included in this study. A total of 18,516 (18.5%) patients encountered downgrading from Bx GG to RP GG. A downgrading of 1 grade occurred in 13,969 (75.4%) of these patients and of 2 or more grades occurred in 4547 (24.6%) patients. A history of higher Bx GG compared with RP GG increased the risk of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) for each given RP GG controlling for age, race, preop prostate-specific antigen level, percentage of positive biopsy cores, and pathologic TNM stages. Specifically, a history of high Bx GG conferred a 45% increased risk of CSM for any given RP GG (hazard ratio = 1.45 95% confidence interval = 1.16-1.82, p < 0.001). Conclusion A history of higher Bx GG, and hence downgrading at the time of RP, demonstrates some value as a risk-stratification tool for future cancer outcomes after prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1520 / 1528
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Downgrading from Biopsy Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for High or Very High Risk Prostate Cancer
    Ranasinghe, Weranja
    Reichard, Chad A.
    Nyame, Yaw A.
    Sundi, Debasish
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Wilkins, Lamont
    Alam, Ridwan
    Achim, Mary F.
    Wang, Xuemei
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    Davis, John W.
    Chapin, Brian F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (04): : 748 - 753
  • [2] Time Trends in Tumor Aggressiveness after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer in Korea
    Kyung, Y.
    Jeong, I
    You, D.
    Hong, J.
    Ahn, H.
    Kim, C.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S300 - S300
  • [3] Defining prostate cancer risk after radical prostatectomy
    Adamis, S.
    Varkaralcis, I. M.
    EJSO, 2014, 40 (05): : 496 - 504
  • [4] Prostate cancer: Predicting risk of metastasis after prostatectomy
    Thoma C.
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2018, 15 (3) : 137 - 137
  • [5] Radiotherapy after prostatectomy in high‑risk prostate cancer
    G. Roviello
    D. Villari
    G. Nesi
    B. Detti
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2020, 22 : 2139 - 2140
  • [6] Risk Stratification of High-grade Prostate Cancer Treated with Antegrade Radical Prostatectomy with Intended Wide Resection
    Yamamoto, Shinya
    Kawakami, Satoru
    Yonese, Junji
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Tsukamoto, Tetsuro
    Ohkubo, Yuhei
    Komai, Yoshinobu
    Ishikawa, Yuichi
    Fukui, Iwao
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 39 (06) : 387 - 393
  • [7] The role of tumor volume on outcome in prostate cancer after prostatectomy
    Brannan, Amber G.
    Johnstone, Peter A. S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2009, 2 (06) : 233 - 237
  • [8] Time to PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy and risk of prostate cancer specific mortality
    Freedland, SJ
    Humphreys, EB
    Mangold, LA
    Eisenberger, M
    Partin, AW
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 382 - 382
  • [9] Radiotherapy after prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer
    Roviello, G.
    Villari, D.
    Nesi, G.
    Detti, B.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 22 (11): : 2139 - 2140
  • [10] Time to prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy and risk of prostate cancer specific mortality
    Kaplan, Mustafa
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2006, 5 (04): : 28 - 30