Optimal voting schemes with costly information acquisition

被引:63
|
作者
Gershkov, Alex [2 ]
Szentes, Balazs [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Econ, Chicago, IL 60657 USA
[2] Univ Bonn, Dept Econ, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Information aggregation; Voting; CONDORCET JURY THEOREM; MECHANISM DESIGN; AGGREGATION; COMMITTEES; ELECTIONS; AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2008.02.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A group of individuals with identical preferences must make a decision under uncertainty about which decision is best. Before the decision is made, each agent can privately acquire a costly and imperfect signal. We discuss how to design a mechanism for eliciting and aggregating the collected information so as to maximize ex-ante social welfare. We first show that, of all mechanisms, a sequential one is optimal and works as follows. At random, one agent at a time is selected to acquire information and report the resulting signal. Agents are informed of neither their position in the sequence nor of other reports. Acquiring information when called upon and reporting truthfully is an equilibrium. We next characterize the ex-ante optimal scheme among all ex-post efficient mechanisms. In this mechanism, a decision is made when the precision of the posterior exceeds a cut-off that decreases with each additional report. The restriction to ex-post efficiency is shown to be without loss when the available signals are sufficiently imprecise. On the other hand, ex-post efficient mechanisms are shown to be suboptimal when the cost of information acquisition is sufficiently small. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 68
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Public goods and voting on formal sanction schemes
    Putterman, Louis
    Tyran, Jean-Robert
    Kamei, Kenju
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2011, 95 (9-10) : 1213 - 1222
  • [42] A framework and taxonomy for comparison of electronic voting schemes
    Sampigethaya, K
    Poovendran, R
    COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2006, 25 (02) : 137 - 153
  • [43] Distributionally Robust Optimal Allocation with Costly Verification
    Bayrak, Halil Ibrahim
    Kocyigit, Cagil
    Kuhn, Daniel
    Pinar, Mustafa Celebi
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [44] The optimal allocation of prizes in contests with costly entry
    Liu, Bin
    Lu, Jingfeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2019, 66 : 137 - 161
  • [45] Optimal provision of a public good with costly exclusion
    Gravel, Nicolas
    Poitevin, Michel
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2019, 117 : 451 - 460
  • [46] Procurement with costly bidding, optimal shortlisting, and rebates
    Fan, Cuihong
    Wolfstetter, Elmar
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 98 (03) : 327 - 334
  • [47] Information aggregation with costly information and random ordering:: Experimental evidence
    Kraemer, C
    Nöth, M
    Weber, M
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2006, 59 (03) : 423 - 432
  • [48] Condorcet Jury Theorem: An example in which informative voting is rational but leads to inefficient information aggregation
    Goertz, Johanna M. M.
    Maniquet, Francois
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 125 (01) : 25 - 28
  • [49] Beyond Condorcet: optimal aggregation rules using voting records
    Baharad, Eyal
    Goldberger, Jacob
    Koppel, Moshe
    Nitzan, Shmuel
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2012, 72 (01) : 113 - 130
  • [50] Information acquisition and efficient mechanism design
    Bergemann, D
    Välimäki, J
    ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (03) : 1007 - 1033