Optimal voting schemes with costly information acquisition

被引:63
|
作者
Gershkov, Alex [2 ]
Szentes, Balazs [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Econ, Chicago, IL 60657 USA
[2] Univ Bonn, Dept Econ, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Information aggregation; Voting; CONDORCET JURY THEOREM; MECHANISM DESIGN; AGGREGATION; COMMITTEES; ELECTIONS; AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2008.02.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A group of individuals with identical preferences must make a decision under uncertainty about which decision is best. Before the decision is made, each agent can privately acquire a costly and imperfect signal. We discuss how to design a mechanism for eliciting and aggregating the collected information so as to maximize ex-ante social welfare. We first show that, of all mechanisms, a sequential one is optimal and works as follows. At random, one agent at a time is selected to acquire information and report the resulting signal. Agents are informed of neither their position in the sequence nor of other reports. Acquiring information when called upon and reporting truthfully is an equilibrium. We next characterize the ex-ante optimal scheme among all ex-post efficient mechanisms. In this mechanism, a decision is made when the precision of the posterior exceeds a cut-off that decreases with each additional report. The restriction to ex-post efficiency is shown to be without loss when the available signals are sufficiently imprecise. On the other hand, ex-post efficient mechanisms are shown to be suboptimal when the cost of information acquisition is sufficiently small. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 68
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Voting with endogenous information acquisition: Experimental evidence
    Bhattacharya, Sourav
    Duffy, John
    Kim, SunTak
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2017, 102 : 316 - 338
  • [2] Auctions with costly information acquisition
    Cremer, Jacques
    Spiegel, Yossi
    Zheng, Charles Z.
    ECONOMIC THEORY, 2009, 38 (01) : 41 - 72
  • [3] Auctions with costly information acquisition
    Jacques Crémer
    Yossi Spiegel
    Charles Z. Zheng
    Economic Theory, 2009, 38 : 41 - 72
  • [4] An optimal voting procedure when voting is costly
    Bognar, Katalin
    Boergers, Tilman
    Meyer-ter-Vehn, Moritz
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2015, 159 : 1056 - 1073
  • [5] Auctions with Dynamic Costly Information Acquisition
    Golrezaei, Negin
    Nazerzadeh, Hamid
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 65 (01) : 130 - 144
  • [6] Information Acquisition, Strategic Voting, and Improving the Quality of Democratic Choice
    Tyson, Scott A.
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2016, 78 (04) : 1016 - 1031
  • [7] Costly information acquisition in centralized matching markets
    Hakimov, Rustamdjan
    Kuebler, Dorothea
    Pan, Siqi
    QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2023, 14 (04) : 1447 - 1490
  • [8] Information acquisition and voting with heterogeneous experts
    Tan, Xu
    Wen, Quan
    RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2020, 51 (04) : 1063 - 1092
  • [9] Information (non)aggregation in markets with costly signal acquisition
    Corgnet, Brice
    Deck, Cary
    DeSantis, Mark
    Porter, David
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2018, 154 : 286 - 320
  • [10] Costly information acquisition. Is it better to toss a coin?
    Triossi, Matteo
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2013, 82 : 169 - 191