Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:34
作者
Ausbeck, Elizabeth B.
Jauk, Victoria C.
Xue, Yumo
Files, Pamela
Kuper, Spencer G.
Subramaniam, Akila
Casey, Brian M.
Szychowski, Jeff M.
Harper, Lorie M.
Tita, Alan T.
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ctr Womens Reprod Hlth, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Deaconess Womens Hosp, Tristate Perinatol, Newburgh, IN USA
关键词
OXYTOCIN; BALLOON;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004041
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether outpatient cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter in nulliparous women undergoing elective labor induction shortens the time from admission to delivery. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial of patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing elective labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation or more with a modified Bishop score less than 5. Women were randomized 1:1 to outpatient or inpatient transcervical Foley. In the outpatient group, the Foley was inserted the day before admission for scheduled induction; insertion was performed at scheduled admission in the inpatient group. The primary outcome was duration of time from admission to the labor and delivery unit to delivery. With 80% power and a two-sided a of 0.05, a sample size of 126 was estimated to detect at least a 5-hour mean difference in time from admission to delivery between groups from a baseline duration of 19 +/- 10 hours. RESULTS: From May 2018 to October 2019, 126 women were randomized, 63 in each group. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups, except that body mass index (31 +/- 5.4 vs 34 +/- 7.5, P=.01) and group B streptococcus colonization (31% vs 54%, P=.01) were lower in the outpatient group. The time from admission to delivery was shorter in the outpatient group (17.4 +/- 7.4 vs 21.7 +/- 9.1 hours, P=.01, mean difference 4.3 hours, 95% CI 1.3-7.2). Admissions before scheduled induction were higher in the outpatient group (22% vs 5%, relative risk [RR] 4.7, 95% CI 1.4-15.4, P,.01), as was median modified Bishop score on admission (3 vs 1, P,.01). Cesarean delivery (24% vs 32%, RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.3, P=.32) and chorioamnionitis (22% vs 13%, RR 1.8, 95% CI 0.8-3.9, P=.16) were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: In nulliparous patients undergoing elective labor induction at term, outpatient cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter reduced the time from admission to delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 606
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, ACOG COMM PRACT B OB
[2]   Outpatient cervical ripening [J].
Amorosa, Jennifer M. H. ;
Stone, Joanne L. .
SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) :488-494
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, OBSTET GYNECOL, V123, P693
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Obsetrics Gynecology, V114, P386, DOI DOI 10.1097/AOG.0B013E3181B48EF5
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Obstet Gynecol, V130, pe217, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0000000000002351, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002398]
[6]   Prevention and management of postpartum hemorrhage: a comparison of 4 national guidelines [J].
Dahlke, Joshua D. ;
Mendez-Figueroa, Hector ;
Maggio, Lindsay ;
Hauspurg, Alisse K. ;
Sperling, Jeffrey D. ;
Chauhan, Suneet P. ;
Rouse, Dwight J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (01) :76.e1-76.e10
[7]   Mechanical methods for induction of labour [J].
de Vaan, Marieke D. T. ;
ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G. ;
Jozwiak, Marta ;
Palmer, Kirsten R. ;
Davies-Tuck, Miranda ;
Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M. ;
Mol, Ben Willem J. ;
Bouvain, Michel .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10)
[8]   Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review [J].
Diederen, M. ;
Gommers, J. S. M. ;
Wilkinson, C. ;
Turnbull, D. ;
Mol, B. W. J. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (09) :1086-1095
[9]   RETRACTED: A prospective randomized trial comparing Foley catheter, oxytocin, and combination Foley catheter-oxytocin for labour induction with unfavourable cervix (Retracted Article) [J].
El Khouly, Nabih I. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 37 (03) :309-314
[10]   Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis [J].
Fox, N. S. ;
Saltzman, D. H. ;
Roman, A. S. ;
Klauser, C. K. ;
Moshier, E. ;
Rebarber, A. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (06) :647-654