The "effectiveness" of differential supervision

被引:18
作者
Harris, PM [1 ]
Gingerich, R
Whittaker, TA
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Coll Publ Policy, San Antonio, TX 78285 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Educ Sch & Counseling Psychol, Columbia, MO USA
关键词
offender classification; responsivity principle; probation supervision;
D O I
10.1177/0011128703258939
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article presents an evaluation of the Client Management Classification System (CMC), a method for assessment and differential supervision of offenders that embodies the principle of responsivity. As in prior evaluations of the CMC, probationers whose officers were trained in CMC techniques experienced lower rates of revocation compared with regularly supervised subjects. However, the experimental group incurred similar or higher rates of rules violations and arrests. Of particular interest, the study found that supervision of experimental subjects did not conform to recommended CMC strategies. In combination, these results suggest the possibility that training in CMC successfully heightened officers' understanding of offender motivations and needs, leading them to view probationer misconduct in a more lenient and flexible context-and thereby producing the appearance of favorable outcomes. The findings have implications for the design of evaluations of efforts to implement principles of effective offender treatment in community corrections agencies.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 271
页数:37
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Andrews D.A., 1998, PSYCHOL CRIMINAL CON
[2]   DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK - A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED METAANALYSIS [J].
ANDREWS, DA ;
ZINGER, I ;
HOGE, RD ;
BONTA, J ;
GENDREAU, P ;
CULLEN, FT .
CRIMINOLOGY, 1990, 28 (03) :369-404
[3]  
Andrews DL, 1999, RES RESULTS EFFECTIV, P151
[4]  
[Anonymous], FORUM CORRECTIONS RE
[5]  
Baird C., 1990, NCCD FOCUS, P1
[6]  
Blumstein A., 1986, CRIMINAL CAREERS CAR
[7]   A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive rehabilitation supervision program [J].
Bonta, J ;
Wallace-Capretta, S ;
Rooney, J .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (03) :312-329
[8]   INMATE CLASSIFICATION [J].
BONTA, J ;
MOTIUK, LL .
JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 1992, 20 (04) :343-353
[9]  
Bonta J., 1995, Forum on Corrections Research, V7, P34
[10]  
BYRNE JM, 1989, RES CORRECTIONS, V2, P1