What attributes of patients affect their involvement in safety? A key opinion leaders' perspective

被引:13
作者
Buetow, Stephen [1 ]
Davis, Rachel [2 ]
Callaghan, Kathleen [3 ]
Dovey, Susan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Gen Practice & Primary Hlth Care, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[2] UCL, Div Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, London, England
[3] Z Energy, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Gen Practice & Rural Hlth, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003104
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Little is known about which attributes the patients need when they wish to maximise their capability to partner safely in healthcare. We aimed to identify these attributes from the perspective of key opinion leaders. Design: Delphi study involving indirect group interaction through a structured two-round survey. Setting: International electronic survey. Participants: 11 (65%) of the 17 invited internationally recognised experts on patient safety completed the study. Outcome measures: 50 patient attributes were rated by the Delphi panel for their ability to contribute maximally to safe health care. Results: The panellists agreed that 13 attributes are important for patients who want to maximise the role of safe partners. These domains relate to: autonomy, awareness, conscientiousness, knowledge, rationality, responsiveness and vigilance; for example, important attributes of autonomy include the ability to speak up, freedom to act and ability to act independently. Spanning seven domains, the attributes emphasise intellectual attributes and, to a lesser extent, moral attributes. Conclusions: Whereas current safety discourses emphasise attributes of professionals, this study identified the patient attributes which key opinion leaders believe can maximise the capability of patients to partner safely in healthcare. Further research is needed that asks patients about the attributes they believe are most important.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WELC JOINT COMM HOM
[2]  
[Anonymous], ROL PAT SAF
[3]   Are patients morally responsible for their errors? [J].
Buetow, S ;
Elwyn, G .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2006, 32 (05) :260-262
[4]   Patient safety and patient error [J].
Buetow, Stephen ;
Elwyn, Glyn .
LANCET, 2007, 369 (9556) :158-161
[5]   Patient Error: A Preliminary Taxonomy [J].
Buetow, Stephen ;
Kiata, Liz ;
Liew, Tess ;
Kenealy, Tim ;
Dovey, Susan ;
Elwyn, Glyn .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2009, 7 (03) :223-231
[6]  
Campbell A.V., 2002, Scottish Journal of Healthcare Chaplaincy, V5, P29
[7]  
Coulter A., 2006, Patient-focused interventions: a review ofthe evidence
[8]   Patient involvement in patient safety: How willing are patients to participate? [J].
Davis, R. E. ;
Sevdalis, N. ;
Vincent, C. A. .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2011, 20 (01) :108-114
[9]   Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement? [J].
Davis, Rachel E. ;
Jacklin, Rosamond ;
Sevdalis, Nick ;
Vincent, Charles A. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2007, 10 (03) :259-267
[10]   An Examination of Opportunities for the Active Patient in Improving Patient Safety [J].
Davis, Rachel E. ;
Sevdalis, Nick ;
Jacklin, Rosamond ;
Vincent, Charles A. .
JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2012, 8 (01) :36-43