Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for >4 cm renal masses

被引:11
|
作者
Alyami, Fahad A. [1 ]
Rendon, Ricardo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Urol, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
来源
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2013年 / 7卷 / 5-6期
关键词
NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; CELL CARCINOMA; TUMORS LARGER; COMPLICATIONS; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.1003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is frequently used to manage cT1a renal masses. While data on safety and long-term oncological outcomes of LPN for T1a tumours are widely available, it is limited for >T1a lesions. We report our experience with LPN for >4 cm renal masses from a Canadian tertiary centre. Methods: Between January 2003 and July 2011, 52 consecutive LPN for >4 cm renal masses were performed. Demographic, pathological and clinical data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Results: The mean patient age was 60 years (62% male). Median tumour size was 4.8 (range: 4.2-11) cm. The median surgical time was 145 minutes, and the median estimated blood loss was 100 mL. The median warm ischemia time was 24 minutes. Four (7.7%) cases required conversion to open surgery. One case was converted to total nephrectomy for clinical and pathological evidence of T3 disease. The surgical margin was positive in 1 case (1.9%). Four (7.7%) patients developed a urine leak postoperatively; 3 of them managed with a ureteric stent. Four (7.7%) patients developed postoperative bleeding requiring selective angioembolization. The median hospital stay was 4 days. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and mean arterial blood pressure (p = 0.5, p = 0.1, respectively). Conclusion: This series demonstrates that LPN although technically challenging has acceptable short-term surgical outcomes. Longterm assessment of oncological outcomes is required. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy >4 cm renal tumours should not be considered a standard of care, but excellent results can be achieved in well-selected patients and in experienced hands with no impact in renal function or blood pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:E281 / E286
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic Cryoablation Versus Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses: Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Observational Studies
    Klatte, Tobias
    Grubmueller, Bernhard
    Waldert, Matthias
    Weibl, Peter
    Remzi, Mesut
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (03) : 435 - 443
  • [42] Simultaneous robotic partial nephrectomy for bilateral renal masses
    Gallo, Fabrizio
    Sforza, Simone
    Luciani, Lorenzo
    Mattevi, Daniele
    Barzaghi, Paolo
    Mari, Andrea
    Di Maida, Fabrizio
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    Cindolo, Luca
    Galfano, Antonio
    Pini, Giovannalberto
    Mantica, Guglielmo
    Schenone, Maurizio
    Schips, Luigi
    Annino, Filippo
    Terrone, Carlo
    Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo
    Gaboardi, Franco
    Minervini, Andrea
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (04) : 1005 - 1010
  • [43] Open Partial Nephrectomy vs. Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for a Renal Tumor Larger than 4 cm: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Lee, Sangchul
    Ryu, Hoyoung
    Lee, Jeong Woo
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 36 (20) : 1 - 8
  • [44] Partial versus radical nephrectomy in clinical T2 renal masses
    Klett, Dane E.
    Tsivian, Matvey
    Packiam, Vignesh T.
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Ahmed, Mohamed E.
    Potretzke, Theodora A.
    Gopalakrishna, Ajay
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Leibovich, Bradley C.
    Potretzke, Aaron M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 28 (11) : 1149 - 1154
  • [45] Robotic assisted partial nephrectomy in the treatment of small renal masses: a literature review
    Paludo, Artur de Oliveira
    Zaduchliver, Jose Pedro Klafke
    Gorgen, Antonio Rebello Horta
    Duarte, Dorival Manrique
    Puliatti, Stefano
    Berger, Milton
    Berger, Andre Kives
    Rosito, Tiago Elias
    Neto, Brasil Silva
    AME MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2025, 10
  • [46] Factors influencing the decision-making in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal masses
    Kazan, Ozgur
    Cakici, Mehmet Caglar
    Kokurcan, Alihan
    Ozenc, Gorkem
    Karakoyunlu, Nihat
    Atis, Gokhan
    Imamoglu, Muhammet Abdurrahim
    Yildirim, Asif
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2023, 90 (04) : 693 - 701
  • [47] Comparison of Video-Assisted Minilaparotomy, Open, and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Choi, Kyung Hwa
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Yang, Seung Choul
    Han, Woong Kyu
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (01) : 151 - 157
  • [48] Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors 4-7 Centimeters
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    Power, Nicholas
    Ghoneim, Tarek
    Touijer, Karim A.
    Dalbagni, Guido
    Russo, Paul
    Coleman, Jonathan A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (03) : 593 - 599
  • [49] Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for Stage Tla of Renal Tumors
    Rezaeetalab, Gholam Hossein
    Karami, Hormoz
    Dadkhah, Farid
    Simforoosh, Nasser
    Shakhssalim, Nasser
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 13 (06) : 2903 - 2907
  • [50] Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    Wheat, Jeffery C.
    Roberts, William W.
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Wolf, J. Stuart, Jr.
    Weizer, Alon Z.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (01) : 57 - 62