Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for >4 cm renal masses

被引:11
|
作者
Alyami, Fahad A. [1 ]
Rendon, Ricardo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Urol, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
来源
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2013年 / 7卷 / 5-6期
关键词
NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; CELL CARCINOMA; TUMORS LARGER; COMPLICATIONS; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.1003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is frequently used to manage cT1a renal masses. While data on safety and long-term oncological outcomes of LPN for T1a tumours are widely available, it is limited for >T1a lesions. We report our experience with LPN for >4 cm renal masses from a Canadian tertiary centre. Methods: Between January 2003 and July 2011, 52 consecutive LPN for >4 cm renal masses were performed. Demographic, pathological and clinical data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Results: The mean patient age was 60 years (62% male). Median tumour size was 4.8 (range: 4.2-11) cm. The median surgical time was 145 minutes, and the median estimated blood loss was 100 mL. The median warm ischemia time was 24 minutes. Four (7.7%) cases required conversion to open surgery. One case was converted to total nephrectomy for clinical and pathological evidence of T3 disease. The surgical margin was positive in 1 case (1.9%). Four (7.7%) patients developed a urine leak postoperatively; 3 of them managed with a ureteric stent. Four (7.7%) patients developed postoperative bleeding requiring selective angioembolization. The median hospital stay was 4 days. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and mean arterial blood pressure (p = 0.5, p = 0.1, respectively). Conclusion: This series demonstrates that LPN although technically challenging has acceptable short-term surgical outcomes. Longterm assessment of oncological outcomes is required. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy >4 cm renal tumours should not be considered a standard of care, but excellent results can be achieved in well-selected patients and in experienced hands with no impact in renal function or blood pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:E281 / E286
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Partial nephrectomy for T2 renal masses: contemporary trends and oncologic efficacy
    Alanee, Shaheen
    Nutt, Max
    Moore, Aaron
    Holland, Bradley
    Dynda, Danuta
    Wilber, Andrew
    El-Zawahry, Ahmed
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 47 (06) : 945 - 950
  • [32] Laparoscopic Radical Versus Partial Nephrectomy for Tumors >4 cm: Intermediate-term Oncologic and Functional Outcomes
    Simmons, Matthew N.
    Weight, Christopher J.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (05) : 1077 - 1082
  • [33] Trifecta and Pentafecta Rates After Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Comparative Study of Patients with Renal Masses <4 and ≥4cm
    Castellucci, Roberto
    Primiceri, Giulia
    Castellan, Pietro
    Marchioni, Michele
    D'Orta, Carlo
    Berardinelli, Francesco
    Neri, Fabio
    Cindolo, Luca
    Schips, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (07): : 799 - 803
  • [34] Preoperative differentiation between benign and malignant renal masses smaller than 4 cm treated with partial nephrectomy
    Nishikawa, Masatomo
    Miyake, Hideaki
    Kitajima, Kazuhiro
    Takahashi, Satoru
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    Fujisawa, Masato
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 20 (01) : 150 - 155
  • [35] Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Single-Surgeon Analysis of >100 Consecutive Procedures
    Wang, Agnes J.
    Bhayani, Sam B.
    UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (02) : 306 - 310
  • [36] Management of high complexity renal masses in partial nephrectomy: A multicenter analysis
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Okhawere, Kennedy E.
    Elbakry, Amr A.
    Dayal, Bheesham D.
    Paulucci, David J.
    Rothberg, Michael B.
    Sfakianos, John P.
    Abaza, Ronney
    Eun, Daniel D.
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    Porter, James
    Badani, Ketan K.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 37 (07) : 437 - 444
  • [37] Initial Experience With Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Multiple Renal Masses
    Boris, Ronald
    Proano, Miguel
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (04) : 1280 - 1286
  • [38] Predictive Factors for Perioperative Blood Transfusions in Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses
    Abu-Ghanem, Yasmin
    Dotan, Zohar
    Kaver, Issac
    Ramon, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 112 (05) : 496 - 502
  • [39] Cumulative Impact of Serial Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Recurrent Renal Masses
    Antony, Maria B.
    Kozel, Zach
    Gopal, Nikhil
    Loebach, Lauren
    Metwalli, Adam R.
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Ball, Mark W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 212 (03) : 431 - 440
  • [40] OPEN PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR COMPLEX TUMOURS AND > 4 CM: IS IT STILL THE GOLD STANDARD TECHNIQUE IN THE MINIMALLY INVASIVE ERA?
    Van Poppel, Hein
    Joniau, Steven
    Goethuys, Hans
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2013, 66 (01): : 129 - 138