Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for >4 cm renal masses

被引:11
|
作者
Alyami, Fahad A. [1 ]
Rendon, Ricardo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Urol, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
来源
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2013年 / 7卷 / 5-6期
关键词
NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; CELL CARCINOMA; TUMORS LARGER; COMPLICATIONS; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.1003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is frequently used to manage cT1a renal masses. While data on safety and long-term oncological outcomes of LPN for T1a tumours are widely available, it is limited for >T1a lesions. We report our experience with LPN for >4 cm renal masses from a Canadian tertiary centre. Methods: Between January 2003 and July 2011, 52 consecutive LPN for >4 cm renal masses were performed. Demographic, pathological and clinical data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Results: The mean patient age was 60 years (62% male). Median tumour size was 4.8 (range: 4.2-11) cm. The median surgical time was 145 minutes, and the median estimated blood loss was 100 mL. The median warm ischemia time was 24 minutes. Four (7.7%) cases required conversion to open surgery. One case was converted to total nephrectomy for clinical and pathological evidence of T3 disease. The surgical margin was positive in 1 case (1.9%). Four (7.7%) patients developed a urine leak postoperatively; 3 of them managed with a ureteric stent. Four (7.7%) patients developed postoperative bleeding requiring selective angioembolization. The median hospital stay was 4 days. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and mean arterial blood pressure (p = 0.5, p = 0.1, respectively). Conclusion: This series demonstrates that LPN although technically challenging has acceptable short-term surgical outcomes. Longterm assessment of oncological outcomes is required. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy >4 cm renal tumours should not be considered a standard of care, but excellent results can be achieved in well-selected patients and in experienced hands with no impact in renal function or blood pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:E281 / E286
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy for 4 to 7 cm Renal Cortical Tumors
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Siddiqui, Sameer
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Leibovich, Bradley C.
    Russo, Paul
    Blute, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06) : 2601 - 2606
  • [22] Should elective partial nephrectomy be performed for renal cell carcinoma >4 cm in size?
    Russo, Paul
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2008, 5 (09): : 482 - 483
  • [23] Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Large (>4 Cm) Kidney Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pavan, Nicola
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    Maria Mir, Carme
    Novara, Giacomo
    Hampton, Lance J.
    Ferro, Matteo
    Perdona, Sisto
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Autorino, Riccardo
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (08) : 2420 - 2428
  • [24] Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors Larger Than 4 cm
    Patel, Manish N.
    Krane, L. Spencer
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Laungani, Rajesh G.
    Shrivastava, Alok
    Siddiqui, Sameer A.
    Menon, Mani
    Rogers, Craig G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (02) : 310 - 316
  • [25] Laparoscopic partial versus radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma over 4 cm
    Zi-Jun Sun
    Feng Liu
    Hai-Bin Wei
    Da-Hong Zhang
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2023, 149 : 17837 - 17848
  • [26] Analysis of Renal Functional Outcomes After Radical or Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses ≥7 cm Using the RENAL Score
    Kopp, Ryan P.
    Liss, Michael A.
    Mehrazin, Reza
    Wang, Song
    Lee, Hak J.
    Jabaji, Ramzi
    Mirheydar, Hossein S.
    Gillis, Kyle
    Patel, Nishant
    Palazzi, Kerrin L.
    Wan, Jim Y.
    Patterson, Anthony L.
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (02) : 312 - 319
  • [27] Propensity-matched pair analysis of safety and efficacy between laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of large renal masses (>10 cm): a retrospective cohort study
    Nian, Xinwen
    Ye, Huamao
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhang, Kaixuan
    Gao, Xu
    Yang, Bo
    Hou, Jianguo
    Xu, Chuanliang
    Wang, Linhui
    Wang, Yan
    Zhang, Wenhui
    Shi, Xiaolei
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2022, 11 (08) : 1148 - 1156
  • [28] Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy is an Effective Procedure for Large (More Than 7 cm) Renal Masses
    Chertin, Boris
    Benjamin, Shalva
    Reissman, Pethachia
    Kheifets, Alexander
    Prat, Orly
    Shenfeld, Ofer Z.
    Sidi, Ami A.
    Tsivian, Alexander
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2009, 19 (04) : 353 - 355
  • [29] Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparison of Posterior and Anterior Renal Masses
    Harris, Kelly T.
    Ball, Mark W.
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Curtiss, Kevin M.
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (06) : 655 - 659
  • [30] Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for a 7-cm Mass in a Renal Allograft
    Kaouk, J. H.
    Spana, G.
    Hillyer, S. P.
    White, M. A.
    Haber, G-P
    Goldfarb, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 (10) : 2242 - 2246