Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for >4 cm renal masses

被引:11
|
作者
Alyami, Fahad A. [1 ]
Rendon, Ricardo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Urol, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
来源
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2013年 / 7卷 / 5-6期
关键词
NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; CELL CARCINOMA; TUMORS LARGER; COMPLICATIONS; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.1003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is frequently used to manage cT1a renal masses. While data on safety and long-term oncological outcomes of LPN for T1a tumours are widely available, it is limited for >T1a lesions. We report our experience with LPN for >4 cm renal masses from a Canadian tertiary centre. Methods: Between January 2003 and July 2011, 52 consecutive LPN for >4 cm renal masses were performed. Demographic, pathological and clinical data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Results: The mean patient age was 60 years (62% male). Median tumour size was 4.8 (range: 4.2-11) cm. The median surgical time was 145 minutes, and the median estimated blood loss was 100 mL. The median warm ischemia time was 24 minutes. Four (7.7%) cases required conversion to open surgery. One case was converted to total nephrectomy for clinical and pathological evidence of T3 disease. The surgical margin was positive in 1 case (1.9%). Four (7.7%) patients developed a urine leak postoperatively; 3 of them managed with a ureteric stent. Four (7.7%) patients developed postoperative bleeding requiring selective angioembolization. The median hospital stay was 4 days. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and mean arterial blood pressure (p = 0.5, p = 0.1, respectively). Conclusion: This series demonstrates that LPN although technically challenging has acceptable short-term surgical outcomes. Longterm assessment of oncological outcomes is required. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy >4 cm renal tumours should not be considered a standard of care, but excellent results can be achieved in well-selected patients and in experienced hands with no impact in renal function or blood pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:E281 / E286
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors >4 cm: Comparison With Renal Tumors ≤4 cm
    Kwon, Ohseong
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    Lee, Sang Eun
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2016, 101 (1-2) : 7 - 13
  • [2] Laparoscopic vs robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumours of >4 cm: a propensity score-based analysis
    Gu, Liangyou
    Ma, Xin
    Wang, Baojun
    Xie, Yongpeng
    Li, Xintao
    Gao, Yu
    Lyu, Xiangjun
    Huang, Qingbo
    Fan, Yang
    Yao, Yuanxin
    Wang, Yunpeng
    Li, Hongzhao
    Zhang, Xu
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (03) : 449 - 455
  • [3] IS LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY ALREADY THE GOLD STANDARD FOR SMALL RENAL MASSES?
    Power, Nicholas E.
    Silberstein, Jonathan L.
    Touijer, Karim
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2013, 66 (01): : 90 - 98
  • [4] Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for large renal masses: results of a European survey
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Piechaud, Thierry
    Gaston, Richard
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Pansadoro, Vito
    Bachmann, Alexander
    Janetschek, Gunter
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 28 (04) : 525 - 529
  • [5] Partial nephrectomy for renal masses > 7cm: Morbidity, oncological and functional outcomes (UroCCR-7 study)
    Rouffilange, J.
    Gobet, A.
    Capon, G.
    Comat, V.
    Lagabrielle, S.
    Guillaume, A.
    Robert, G.
    Bensadoun, H.
    Ferriere, J. -M.
    Bernhard, J. -C.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2018, 28 (12): : 588 - 595
  • [6] Retrospective Comparison of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Renal Cryoablation for Small (<3.5 cm) Cortical Renal Masses
    Haramis, Georgios
    Graversen, Joseph A.
    Mues, Adam C.
    Korets, Ruslan
    Rosales, Juan Carlos
    Okhunov, Zhamshid
    Badani, Ketan K.
    Gupta, Mantu
    Landman, Jaime
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (02): : 152 - 157
  • [7] Laparoscopic partial versus radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma over 4 cm
    Sun, Zi-Jun
    Liu, Feng
    Wei, Hai-Bin
    Zhang, Da-Hong
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (20) : 17823 - 17836
  • [8] Perioperative Efficacy of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Tumors Larger than 4 cm
    Simmons, Matthew N.
    Chung, Benjamin I.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (01) : 199 - 208
  • [9] Multi-Institutional Analysis of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors > 4 cm Versus ≤ 4 cm in 445 Consecutive Patients
    Petros, Firas
    Sukumar, Shyam
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Dulabon, Lori
    Bhayani, Sam
    Stifelman, Michael
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Rogers, Craig
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (06) : 642 - 646
  • [10] Partial nephrectomy for renal masses ≥7 cm: technical, oncological and functional outcomes
    Long, Christopher J.
    Canter, Daniel J.
    Kutikov, Alexander
    Li, Tianyu
    Simhan, Jay
    Smaldone, Marc
    Teper, Ervin
    Viterbo, Rosalia
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Chen, David Y. T.
    Greenberg, Richard E.
    Uzzo, Robert G.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (10) : 1450 - 1456