共 50 条
Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Stage I Endometrial Cancer: An Updated Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
被引:134
|作者:
Kong, Anthony
[1
,2
]
Johnson, Nick
[3
]
Kitchener, Henry C.
[4
]
Lawrie, Theresa A.
[5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Oncol, Oxford, England
[2] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Oxford, England
[3] Royal United Hosp NHS Trust, Bath, Avon, England
[4] Univ Manchester, St Marys Hosp, Acad Unit Obstet & Gynaecol, Manchester M13 0JH, Lancs, England
[5] Royal United Hosp, Cochrane Gynaecol Canc Review Grp, Bath BA1 3NG, Avon, England
来源:
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
|
2012年
/
104卷
/
21期
关键词:
EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY;
RADIATION-THERAPY;
POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY;
MRC ASTEC;
CARCINOMA;
TRIAL;
BRACHYTHERAPY;
INTERMEDIATE;
IRRADIATION;
SURGERY;
D O I:
10.1093/jnci/djs374
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in stage I endometrial cancer has changed in recent years. This updated Cochrane systematic review aimed to reexamine the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant radiotherapy vs no treatment in stage I endometrial cancer. We searched various databases including The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group (CGCRG) for randomized controlled trials that met the predefined inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes were endometrial cancerspecific survival, locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, and toxicity. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated and pooled if possible; otherwise, dichotomous data were extracted. All statistical tests were two-sided. Of the eight included trials, seven trials (3628 women) compared external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and no EBRT (or vaginal brachytherapy [VBT]), and one trial (645 women) compared VBT and no additional treatment. EBRT statistically significantly reduced locoregional recurrence compared with no EBRT (or VBT alone) (HR 0.36, 95% confidence Interval [CI] 0.25 to 0.52; P < .001), but this did not translate into an improvement in OS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.20; P .95), endometrial cancerspecific survival (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.28; P .80), or distant recurrence rates (risk ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.35; P .77). EBRT was associated with an increased risk of severe acute toxicity, severe late toxicity, and reduced quality of life scores. EBRT reduces the risk of locoregional recurrence but has no statistically significant impact on cancer-related deaths or OS. However, EBRT is associated with clinically and statistically significant morbidity and a reduction in quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:1625 / 1634
页数:10
相关论文