Medicare Chronic Care Management Payments and Financial Returns to Primary Care Practices A Modeling Study

被引:42
作者
Basu, Sanjay [1 ]
Phillips, Russell S.
Bitton, Asaf
Song, Zirui
Landon, Bruce E.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS; GLOBAL PAYMENT; COMMUNITY CARE; HOME PILOT; PATIENT; HEALTH; COST; QUALITY; ORGANIZATIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.7326/M14-2677
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Physicians have traditionally been reimbursed for face-to-face visits. A new non-visit-based payment for chronic care management (CCM) of Medicare patients took effect in January 2015. Objective: To estimate financial implications of CCM payment for primary care practices. Design: Microsimulation model incorporating national data on primary care use, staffing, expenditures, and reimbursements. Data Sources: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and other published sources. Target Population: Medicare patients. Time Horizon: 10 years. Perspective: Practice-level. Intervention: Comparison of CCM delivery approaches by staff and physicians. Outcome Measures: Net revenue per full-time equivalent (FTE) physician; time spent delivering CCM services. Results of Base-Case Analysis: If nonphysician staff were to deliver CCM services, net revenue to practices would increase despite opportunity and staffing costs. Practices could expect approximately $332 per enrolled patient per year (95% CI, $234 to $429) if CCM services were delivered by registered nurses RNs), approximately $372 (CI, $276 to $468) if services were delivered by licensed practical nurses, and approximately $385 (CI, $286 to $485) if services were delivered by medical assistants. For a typical practice, this equates to more than $75 000 of net annual revenue per FTE physician and 12 hours of nursing service time per week if 50% of eligible patients enroll. At a minimum, 131 Medicare patients (CI, 115 to 140 patients) must enroll for practices to recoup the salary and overhead costs of hiring a full-time RN to provide CCM services. Results of Sensitivity Analysis: If physicians were to deliver all CCM services, approximately 25% of practices nationwide could expect net revenue losses due to opportunity costs of face-to-face visit time. Limitation: The CCM program may alter long-term primary care use, which is difficult to predict. Conclusion: Practices that rely on nonphysician team members to deliver CCM services will probably experience substantial net revenue gains but must enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to recoup costs.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
American Academy of Family Physicians, 2014, FPM SER DIR OBS PRIM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, CURRENT POPULATION S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MED EXP PAN SURV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, OCC OUTL HDB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CONS PRIC IND
[6]   Implications of Workforce and Financing Changes for Primary Care Practice Utilization, Revenue, and Cost A Generalizable Mathematical Model for Practice Management [J].
Basu, Sanjay ;
Landon, Bruce E. ;
Song, Zirui ;
Bitton, Asaf ;
Phillips, Russell S. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2015, 53 (02) :125-132
[7]   Complexity in Mathematical Models of Public Health Policies: A Guide for Consumers of Models [J].
Basu, Sanjay ;
Andrews, Jason .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2013, 10 (10)
[8]   Vermont's Blueprint For Medical Homes, Community Health Teams, And Better Health At Lower Cost [J].
Bielaszka-DuVernay, Christina .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2011, 30 (03) :383-386
[9]   Modeling Good Research Practices-Overview: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1 [J].
Caro, J. Jaime ;
Briggs, Andrew H. ;
Siebert, Uwe ;
Kuntz, Karen M. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (05) :667-677
[10]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention / National Center for Health Statistics, 2014, NAT AMB MED CAR SURV