Prognostic factors for survival in breast cancer patients who developed distant metastasis subsequent to definitive surgery

被引:1
作者
Kuru, B. [1 ]
Camlibel, M. [2 ]
Dinc, S. [2 ]
Gulcelik, M. A. [2 ]
Gonullu, D. [3 ]
Alagol, H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, TR-55139 Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey
[2] Ankara Oncol Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Taksim Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
apex axillary invasion; breast cancer; oestrogen receptor; skeletal metastasis; stage IIIC breast cancer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The present study was undertaken to define the prognostic factors for overall survival subsequent to definitive surgery, and for survival after the development of distant metastasis in breast cancer patients who developed distant metastasis subsequent to definitive surgery. Methods: The records of 470 breast cancer patients with T1-3 tumours and distant metastasis following surgery were reviewed. Prognostic factors were compared to the first metastatic sites as solitary skeletal, multiple skeletal, and visceral metastases, and were analysed for overall survival following surgery and survival after metastasis. Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate analysis was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: 79 patients (17 percent) had a solitary skeletal metastasis, 105 (22 percent) had multiple skeletal metastases, and 286 (61 percent) had a visceral metastasis. The five-year overall survival was significantly better for patients with a solitary bone metastasis (73 percent) compared to patients who had multiple bone metastases (46 percent), or a visceral metastasis (22 percent) (p-value is less than 0.0001). Pathological lymph node status 3, stage IIIC, grade 3, oestrogen receptor negativity, and visceral metastases were found to have independent detrimental influence on overall survival following surgery and survival after metastasis. A long-term metastasis-free interval affected post-metastatic outcome favourably. Radiotherapy improved overall survival. Conclusion: Pathological lymph node status, stage, grade, and oestrogen receptor status predicted survival after surgery as well as after the development of metastasis. Solitary bone metastasis has a more favourable prognosis than multiple bone metastases, and compared to visceral metastasis, skeletal metastasis has a more favourable prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:904 / 911
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Survival of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma - Importance of prognostic markers of the primary tumor
    Chang, J
    Clark, GM
    Allred, DC
    Mohsin, S
    Chamness, G
    Elledge, RM
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 97 (03) : 545 - 553
  • [2] SURVIVAL FROM 1ST RECURRENCE - RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN 1,015 BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS
    CLARK, GM
    SLEDGE, GW
    OSBORNE, CK
    MCGUIRE, WL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [3] Clinical course and prognostic factors following bone recurrence from breast cancer
    Coleman, RE
    Smith, P
    Rubens, RD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 77 (02) : 336 - 340
  • [4] PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP
    ELSTON, CW
    ELLIS, IO
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) : 403 - 410
  • [5] Bisphosphonates: Preclinical review
    Green, JR
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2004, 9 : 3 - 13
  • [6] HENDERSON IC, 1990, CANCER, V66, P1439, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:14+<1439::AID-CNCR2820661421>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-M
  • [8] Hosmer D.W., 1999, Applied survival analysis: regression modelling of time to event data
  • [9] HOWELL A, 1984, LANCET, V1, P588
  • [10] Prognostic factors predicting survival from first recurrence in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of 439 patients
    Insa, A
    Lluch, A
    Prosper, F
    Marugan, I
    Martinez-Agullo, A
    Garcia-Conde, J
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1999, 56 (01) : 67 - 78