In vitro susceptibility of resistant Escherichia coli field isolates to antimicrobial combinations

被引:15
作者
Abu-Basha, E. A. [1 ]
Gharaibeh, S. M. [2 ]
Thabet, A. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Vet Basic Med Sci, Fac Vet Med, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[2] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Pathol & Anim Hlth, Fac Vet Med, Irbid 22110, Jordan
关键词
antimicrobial combination; checkerboard; Escherichia coli; minimum inhibitory concentration; resistance; ORNITHOBACTERIUM-RHINOTRACHEALE; GENTAMICIN; CIPROFLOXACIN; AMOXICILLIN; ENROFLOXACIN; FLORFENICOL;
D O I
10.3382/japr.2011-00500
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Avian colibacillosis is an infectious disease of chickens caused by avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Respiratory viruses and Mycoplasma infections cause damage to the respiratory system of chickens and predispose them to APEC. The APEC field isolates have begun showing increased antimicrobial resistance, leading to failure of treatment and increasing treatment costs and production losses. The objective of this study was to investigate the susceptibility of APEC to different antimicrobial combinations by using minimum inhibitory concentration and checkerboard tests. All 18 APEC isolates were resistant to amoxicillin, clavulanic acid, doxycycline, oxytetracycline, and erythromycin, whereas 71 and 76% of these isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin, respectively. Fosfomycin had the best activity against the resistant isolates, followed by gentamicin, spectinomycin, and florfenicol, with resistant percentages of 35, 41, 47, and 53%, respectively. A total of 46 antibiotic combinations were used to test each E. coli field isolate using the checkerboard technique. On the basis of checkerboard results for synergistic and partial synergistic activities, the combinations of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin-fosfomycin, oxytetracycline-erythromycin, oxytetracycline-florfenicol, amoxicillin-gentamicin, oxytetracycline-spectinomycin, and spectinomycin-erythromycin were the best in vitro antimicrobials, with synergistic and partial synergistic activities in more than 80% of the E. coli field isolates. Further in vivo studies are needed to correlate the in vitro susceptibility results with field efficacy studies to reduce economic losses in the poultry industry.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 602
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Comparative pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of amoxycillin in chickens after intravenous, intramuscular and oral administrations [J].
Abo El-Sooud, K ;
Al-Tarazi, YH ;
Al-Bataineh, MM .
VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, 28 (07) :599-607
[2]   Comparative pharmacokinetics of gentamicin after intravenous, intramuscular, subcutaneous and oral administration in broiler chickens [J].
Abu-Basha, E. A. ;
Idkaidek, N. M. ;
Al-Shunnaq, A. F. .
VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2007, 31 (06) :765-773
[3]   BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 7) [J].
Andrews, J. M. .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008, 62 (02) :256-278
[4]   Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations [J].
Andrews, JM .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 48 :5-16
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, J VET PHARM THERAPEU, DOI DOI 10.1034/J.1600-051X.26.S2.1.X
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1993, M7A3 NAT COMM CLIN L
[7]   New aspect of the synergistic antibacterial action of ampicillin and gentamicin [J].
Barnes, AI ;
Herrero, IL ;
Albesa, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2005, 26 (02) :146-151
[8]  
Barnes H.J., 2008, Diseases of Poultry, V12th ed., P691
[9]   Serotypes of Escherichia coli isolated from septicaemic chickens in Galicia (Northwest Spain) [J].
Blanco, JE ;
Blanco, M ;
Mora, A ;
Jansen, WH ;
García, V ;
Vázquez, ML ;
Blanco, J .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 61 (03) :229-235
[10]   INVITRO BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY OF AMOXICILLIN, GENTAMICIN, RIFAMPICIN, CIPROFLOXACIN AND TRIMETHOPRIM-SULFAMETHOXAZOLE ALONE OR IN COMBINATION AGAINST LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES [J].
BOISIVON, A ;
GUIOMAR, C ;
CARBON, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1990, 9 (03) :206-209