(Re)Building Home and Community in the Social Housing Sector: Lessons from a South Australian Approach

被引:5
作者
Tually, Selina [1 ]
Skinner, William [2 ]
Faulkner, Debbie [1 ]
Goodwin-Smith, Ian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, UniSA Business, Australian Alliance Social Enterprise, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Social Sci, Anthropol & Dev Studies, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
co-production; community development; community housing; disadvantage; place-making; social housing; social inclusion; social landlord; stock transfer; tenants; POLICY;
D O I
10.17645/si.v8i3.2822
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Australia's social housing sector is under great pressure. Actions to improve social housing sector capacity and responsiveness have occupied the minds and endeavours of many policy makers, practitioners and scholars for some time now. This article focusses on one approach to challenges within the sector recently adopted in a socio-economically disadvantaged area within Adelaide, South Australia: transfer of housing stock from the public to the community housing sector for capacity and community building purposes (the Better Places, Stronger Communities Public Housing Transfer Program). The discussion draws on evaluative research about this northern Adelaide program, which has a deliberate theoretical and practical foundation in community development and place-making as a means for promoting and strengthening social inclusion, complementing its tenancy management and asset growth focuses. Tenants and other stakeholders report valued outcomes from the program's community development activities-the focus of this article-which have included the co-production of new and necessary social and physical infrastructures to support community participation and engagement among (vulnerable) tenants and residents, confidence in the social landlord and greater feelings of safety and inclusion among tenants, underpinning an improving sense of home, community and place. Consideration of program outcomes and lessons reminds us of the importance of the 'social' in social housing and social landlords. The program provides a model for how social landlords can work with tenants and others to (re)build home and community in places impacted by structural disadvantage, dysfunction, or change. The article adds to the literature on the role of housing, in this case community housing, as a vehicle for place-making and promoting community development and social inclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 101
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Anglicare SA, 2015, BETTER PLACES STRONG
[2]  
AnglicareSA, 2019, BETTER PLACES STRONG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Good Times, Hard Times
[4]  
August M., 2019, A research agenda for housing, P116, DOI [10.4337/9781788116510.00015, DOI 10.4337/9781788116510.00015]
[5]  
Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, 2017, INQ PROP TRANSF METH
[6]  
Australian Social Inclusion Board, 2012, SOC INCL AUSTR AUSTR
[7]   Plant closures, precariousness and policy responses: Revisiting MG Rover 10 years on [J].
Bailey, David ;
de Ruyter, Alex .
POLICY STUDIES, 2015, 36 (04) :363-383
[8]  
Beer A., 2008, POLICY STUDIES, V29, P319, DOI DOI 10.1080/01442870802159970
[9]   The closure of the Australian car manufacturing industry: redundancy, policy and community impacts [J].
Beer, Andrew .
AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHER, 2018, 49 (03) :419-438
[10]  
Blunden H., 2017, EVALUATION BETTER PL, DOI [10.4225/53/5a29d589a582c, DOI 10.4225/53/5A29D589A582C]