ARE THERE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MANAGEMENT AND PHYSIOTHERAPY STUDENTS IN VOCATIONAL INTEREST WITH REGARD TO GENDER?

被引:0
作者
Ochnik, Dominika [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Opole, Dept Psychol, Opole, Poland
来源
EDULEARN19: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES | 2019年
关键词
vocational interests; field of study; gender differences; Management; Physiotherapy; ETHNICITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to reveal the differences between Management and Physiotherapy students with regard to gender. It was expected that women will score higher in pro-social and methodical interests and men in technical. Due to specific work environment, it was expected that students of Physiotherapy will be more pro-social and will score lower in leadership type compared to students of Management. The study encompassed 393 students of Management (n = 128) and Physiotherapy (n = 265), including 221 women (56%) and 172 men (44%). The study was conducted by means of The Vocational Potential Inventory by Ochnik, Stala, & Rosmus (2016) featuring five types of vocational preferences: Pro-social, Leadership, Creative, Technical, and Methodical. The results of two-way ANOVA showed significant although small effect in leadership vocational interests, with students of Management scoring higher in this type of interests. The pro-social, creative, technical and methodical types were no differ due to the field of study. The significant gender effect was found in pro-social, leadership, technical and methodical types of vocational interests. Women scored higher in pro-social type but men in leadership, technical and methodical vocational interests. The results only partly confirmed hypotheses. The study revealed that students of Physiotherapy are no more pro-social than students of Management but students of Management have stronger leadership vocational interests.
引用
收藏
页码:5608 / 5613
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Validity of Person Matching in Vocational Interest Inventories [J].
Burns, Stephanie T. .
CAREER DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2014, 62 (02) :114-127
[2]   Cross-cultural differences in vocational interests: Between-groups differences on the strong interest inventory [J].
Fouad, NA .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 49 (03) :283-289
[3]  
Holland J. L., 1997, Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments, V3rd
[4]   Vocational Interests in the United States: Sex, Age, Ethnicity, and Year Effects [J].
Morris, Michael L. .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 63 (05) :604-615
[5]   The Development, Evolution, and Status of Holland's Theory of Vocational Personalities: Reflections and Future Directions for Counseling Psychology [J].
Nauta, Margaret M. .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 57 (01) :11-22
[6]  
Ochnik D., 2018, CZASOPISMO PSYCHOL P, V24, P151, DOI [10.14691/CPPJ.24.1.151, DOI 10.14691/CPPJ.24.1.151]
[7]  
Ochnik D, 2017, PSYCHOL J, V23, P241, DOI DOI 10.14691/CPPJ.23.2.241
[8]  
Ochnik D., 2016, ZARZADZANIE ZASOBAMI, V6, P43
[9]  
Ochnik D, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY (IMES 2018), P857
[10]   The effects of vocational interest on study results: Student person - environment fit and program interest diversity [J].
Schelfhout, Stijn ;
Wille, Bart ;
Fonteyne, Lot ;
Roels, Elisabeth ;
De Fruyt, Filip ;
Duyck, Wouter .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04)