Schoolbag Weight Limit: Can It Be Defined?

被引:51
作者
Dockrell, Sara [1 ]
Simms, Ciaran [2 ]
Blake, Catherine [3 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Med, Discipline Physiotherapy, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth Physiotherapy & Populat Sci, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
schoolbag; load limit; guidelines; LOW-BACK-PAIN; NONSPECIFIC MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; RISK-FACTORS; SPINAL CURVATURE; LOAD PLACEMENT; CHILDREN; SCHOOLCHILDREN; BACKPACKS; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1111/josh.12040
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Carrying a schoolbag is a daily activity for most children and much research has been conducted in an effort to identify a safe load limit for children to carry in their schoolbags. Despite this, there is still no consensus about guideline weight and other factors associated with carrying a schoolbag. The objective of this article is to review the literature on schoolbags with particular emphasis on the load limit guidelines and schoolbag-related musculoskeletal pain, and to suggest directions for school health and future research. METHODS Science Direct, PubMed, AMED, CINAHL, OVID, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed articles using combinations of the following key words: schoolbag, backpack, rucksack, knapsack, satchel, book bag, book pack and included combinations of children, pain, gait, and posture. Article references were also checked for further citations. All are in English, with the exception of one which is in German but is widely cited. RESULTS There are conflicting findings in the literature. The recommended load limit for schoolchildren to carry varies from 5% to 20% of their body weight, and the evidence linking backpack weight and back pain is inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS The shortcomings in the current literature should be addressed so that evidence-based guidelines can be provided to schoolchildren, parents, and teachers. It is suggested that general guidance may be more appropriate than a single load limit guideline.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 377
页数:10
相关论文
共 81 条
[31]   Effects of sex and mode of carrying schoolbags on ground reaction forces and temporal characteristics of gait [J].
Kellis, Eleftherios ;
Arampatzi, Fotini .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2009, 18 (05) :275-282
[32]   Changes in neck muscle electromyography and forward head posture of children when carrying schoolbags [J].
Kim, M. H. ;
Yi, C. H. ;
Kwon, O. Y. ;
Cho, S. H. ;
Yoo, W. G. .
ERGONOMICS, 2008, 51 (06) :890-901
[33]   Backpacks, back pain, sagittal spinal curves and trunk alignment in adolescents - A logistic and multinomial logistic analysis [J].
Korovessis, P ;
Koureas, G ;
Zacharatos, S ;
Papazisis, Z .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (02) :247-255
[34]   Correlation between backpack weight and way of carrying, sagittal and frontal spinal curvatures, athletic activity, and dorsal and low back pain in schoolchildren and adolescents [J].
Korovessis, P ;
Koureas, G ;
Papazisis, Z .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2004, 17 (01) :33-40
[35]   Risk factors for non-specific low back pain in schoolchildren and their parents:: a population based study [J].
Kovacs, FM ;
Gestoso, M ;
del Real, MTG ;
López, J ;
Mufraggi, N ;
Méndez, JI .
PAIN, 2003, 103 (03) :259-268
[36]   Leisure physical activity and various pain symptoms among adolescents [J].
Kujala, UM ;
Taimela, S ;
Viljanen, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 33 (05) :325-328
[37]   Effect of single and double strap backpacks on lung function [J].
Legg, SJ ;
Cruz, CO .
ERGONOMICS, 2004, 47 (03) :318-323
[38]   Children at risk - Risk factors for low back pain in the elementary school environment [J].
Limon, S ;
Valinsky, LJ ;
Ben-Shalom, Y .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (06) :697-702
[39]   The backpack problem is evident but the solution is less obvious [J].
Lindstrom-Hazel, Debra .
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2009, 32 (03) :329-338
[40]   Postural and subjective responses to realistic schoolbag carriage [J].
Mackie, H. W. ;
Legg, S. J. .
ERGONOMICS, 2008, 51 (02) :217-231