The Case for Participatory Evaluation in an Era of Accountability

被引:75
作者
Chouinard, Jill Anne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, 72 Harmer Ave, Ottawa, ON K1Y 0T8, Canada
关键词
participatory evaluation; accountability; performance management; new public management;
D O I
10.1177/1098214013478142
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Evaluation occurs within a specific context and is influenced by the economic, political, historical, and social forces that shape that context. The culture of evaluation is thus very much embedded in the culture of accountability that currently prevails in public sector institutions, policies, and program. As such, our understanding of the reception and use of participatory approaches to evaluation must include an understanding of the practices of new public management and of the concomitant call for accountability and performance measurement standards that currently prevail. In this article, the author discusses how accountability has been defined and understood in the context of government policies, programs, and services and provides a brief discussion of participatory and collaborative approaches to evaluation and the interrelationship between participatory evaluation and technical approaches to evaluation. The main part of the article is a critical look at key tensions between participatory and technocratic approaches to evaluation. The article concludes with a focus on the epistemological and cultural implications of the current culture of public accountability.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 253
页数:17
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Sharing stories - Narrative and dialogue in responsive nursing evaluation
    Abma, TA
    Widdershoven, GAA
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2005, 28 (01) : 90 - 109
  • [2] [Anonymous], POL EV
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, A question of trust: the 2002 Reith lectures
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, FED REG
  • [5] BEHN RobertD., 1998, INT PUBLIC MANAG J, V2, P131, DOI [10.1016/S1096-7494(99)80088-9, DOI 10.1016/S1096-7494(99)80088-9]
  • [6] Behn RobertD., 2001, Rethinking Democratic Accountability
  • [7] Bell S., 2004, PUBLIC ADMIN DEVELOP, V14, P323
  • [8] Biesta G.J., 2004, Educational Theory, V54, P233, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.0013-2004.2004.00017.X
  • [9] Biott C., 2000, EVALUATION-US, V6, P399
  • [10] Blalock A.B., 1999, EVALUATION-US, V5, P117, DOI DOI 10.1177/13563899922208887