Innovation Failure and Learning Revisited: Conceptual Model and Empirical Evidence

被引:0
|
作者
Tovstiga, George [1 ]
Grossmann, Henning [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Henley On Thames RG9 5HN, Oxon, England
[2] Fdn TECHNOPK, CH-8005 Zurich, Switzerland
来源
IFKAD - KCWS 2012: 7TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS, 5TH KNOWLEDGE CITIES WORLD SUMMIT: KNOWLEDGE, INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY: INTEGRATING MICRO & MACRO PERSPECTIVES | 2012年
关键词
strategic innovation; differentiation; competitive advantage; organisational learning; start-up enterprises;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose: The premise explored in this paper is that strategic innovation encompasses both differentiation and organisational learning outcomes, whereby some of the learning outcome may have its origins in 'intelligent' innovation failure. While by no means a new insight, there is little empirical evidence in the literature to help explain the linkage between innovation and its various expressions as differentiation, organisational learning and failure. This study sets out to explore these linkages. Design/methodology/approach: This study is based on a conceptual model linking innovation effort, outcomes and competitive impact is proposed, and empirical research to corroborate the construct thus defined. Quantitative analysis of data derived from field research conducted with a sampling of entrepreneurial start-up firms hosted by a Swiss technology park forms the basis of the analysis. Originality/value: Statistical analysis (descriptive analyses, correlation analysis and regression analysis) provides evidence suggesting linkages between innovation learning outcomes derived from failed innovation effort and innovation leading to differentiation. Practical implications: The outcomes suggest key linkages between innovation outcomes derived from differentiation, learning and "intelligent" failure; moreover, preliminary implications for maximising differentiation outcomes through appropriate leveraging of learning derived from failed innovation effort are derived from the findings of this exploratory study.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 830
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A conceptual model of learning culture and innovation schema
    Tran, Thuhang
    COMPETITIVENESS REVIEW, 2008, 18 (03) : 287 - +
  • [2] Effective maritime security: conceptual model and empirical evidence
    Thai, Vinh V.
    MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2009, 36 (02) : 147 - 163
  • [3] Maritime knowledge clusters: A conceptual model and empirical evidence
    Zhou, Yusheng
    Yuen, Kum Fai
    Tan, Beverly
    Thai, Vinh V.
    MARINE POLICY, 2021, 123
  • [4] Logistics service quality: conceptual model and empirical evidence
    Thai, Vinh V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2013, 16 (02) : 114 - 131
  • [5] Pride in foreign language learning: a conceptual framework and empirical evidence
    Khajavy, Gholam Hassan
    Lueftenegger, Marko
    INNOVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING, 2024,
  • [6] Disruptive Innovation: Conceptual Foundations, Empirical Evidence, and Research Opportunities in the Digital Age
    Hopp, Christian
    Antons, David
    Kaminski, Jermain
    Salge, Torsten Oliver
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 35 (03) : 446 - 457
  • [7] A conceptual model of organizational innovation: An empirical study on universities of technology in Taiwan
    Shyu, M. L.
    Chi, H. J.
    Chiu, W. H.
    Cheng, B. W.
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 186 - +
  • [8] Digital media revisited: Theoretical and conceptual innovation
    Mondloch, K
    ART JOURNAL, 2004, 63 (02) : 98 - 100
  • [9] Service quality in maritime transport: conceptual model and empirical evidence
    Thai, Vinh V.
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2008, 20 (04) : 493 - 518
  • [10] Evaluation and assessment of privatization outcomes: a conceptual model and empirical evidence
    Molz, R
    Hafsi, T
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 1997, 15 (04): : 481 - 495