Evaluating Virtual and Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with COPD

被引:14
作者
Barata, Paula Irina [1 ]
Crisan, Alexandru Florian [1 ]
Maritescu, Adelina [1 ]
Negrean, Rodica Anamaria [2 ]
Rosca, Ovidiu [3 ,4 ]
Bratosin, Felix [4 ]
Citu, Cosmin [5 ]
Oancea, Cristian [1 ]
机构
[1] Victor Babes Univ Med & Pharm Timisoara, Ctr Res & Innovat Precis Med Resp Dis, Eftimie Murgu Sq 2, Timisoara 300041, Romania
[2] Univ Oradea, Fac Med & Pharm, Oradea 410073, Romania
[3] Victor Babes Univ Med & Pharm Timisoara, Dept 3, Discipline Infect Dis, Eftimie Murgu Sq 2, Timisoara 300041, Romania
[4] Victor Babes Univ Med & Pharm Timisoara, Methodol & Infect Dis Res Ctr, Dept Infect Dis, Eftimie Murgu Sq 2, Timisoara 300041, Romania
[5] Victor Babes Univ Med & Pharm Timisoara, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Eftimie Murgu Sq 2, Timisoara 300041, Romania
关键词
COPD; pulmonary rehabilitation; digitalization of healthcare; respiratory disease; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; DISEASE; IMPLEMENTATION; PARTICIPATION; STATEMENT; DELIVERY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.3390/jpm12111764
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasingly frequent disorder that is likely to become the third leading cause of morbidity worldwide. It significantly degrades the quality of life of patients affected and poses a significant financial burden to the healthcare systems providing treatment and rehabilitation. Consequently, our study's purpose was to compare conventional inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) with virtual (online) PR using a mobile phone application. During a three-month period, two groups of patients followed the research protocol by participating in a pulmonary rehabilitation program administered and supervised by a physical therapist five times per week. A number of respiratory variables were examined before and after the test. At the end of the study period, a total of 72 patients completed the rehabilitation in the inpatient group, respectively 58 in the online group. It was observed that post-test comparison between patients undergoing the traditional and online rehabilitation methods did not show any significant differences. However, the calculated mean differences between pre-test and post-test results were significantly higher in favor of the virtual method. The most significant variations were encountered in maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (6.6% vs. 8.5%, p-value < 0.001), 6-min walking test (6MWT) (6.7% vs. 9.4%, p-value < 0.001), and COPD assessment test (CAT) values (4.8 vs. 6.2, p-value < 0.001), respectively. However, the maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) variation was significantly higher in patients undergoing the traditional rehabilitation method, from an average of 4.1% to 3.2% (p-value < 0.001). In this preliminary study, the online pulmonary rehabilitation program proved non-inferiority to the traditional method, with significantly better results in several measurements. Additional studies using larger cohorts of patients and longer exposure to the online rehabilitation program are required to validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE
[2]   Respiratory muscle training program supplemented by a cell-phone application in COPD patients with severe airflow limitation [J].
Barata Paula, Irina ;
Marc, Monica Steluta ;
Tudorache, Emanuela ;
Manolescu, Diana ;
Olar, Cristina Dana ;
Frandes, Mirela ;
Oancea, Cristian .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 190
[3]   PSYCHOPHYSICAL BASES OF PERCEIVED EXERTION [J].
BORG, GAV .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1982, 14 (05) :377-381
[4]   Online versus face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled trial [J].
Bourne, Simon ;
DeVos, Ruth ;
North, Malcolm ;
Chauhan, Anoop ;
Ben Green ;
Brown, Thomas ;
Cornelius, Victoria ;
Wilkinson, Tom .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (07)
[5]   Interactive web-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme: a randomised controlled feasibility trial [J].
Chaplin, Emma ;
Hewitt, Stacey ;
Apps, Lindsay ;
Bankart, John ;
Pulikottil-Jacob, Ruth ;
Boyce, Sally ;
Morgan, Mike ;
Williams, Johanna ;
Singh, Sally .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (03)
[6]   Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J].
Christenson, Stephanie A. ;
Smith, Benjamin M. ;
Bafadhel, Mona ;
Putcha, Nirupama .
LANCET, 2022, 399 (10342) :2227-2242
[7]   Pulmonary rehabilitation referral and participation are commonly influenced by environment, knowledge, and beliefs about consequences: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework [J].
Cox, Narelle S. ;
Oliveira, Cristino C. ;
Lahham, Aroub ;
Holland, Anne E. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2017, 63 (02) :84-93
[8]   ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test [J].
Crapo, RO ;
Casaburi, R ;
Coates, AL ;
Enright, PL ;
MacIntyre, NR ;
McKay, RT ;
Johnson, D ;
Wanger, JS ;
Zeballos, RJ ;
Bittner, V ;
Mottram, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 166 (01) :111-117
[9]   Drop-out and attendance in pulmonary rehabilitation: The role of clinical and psychosocial variables [J].
Fischer, Maarten J. ;
Scharloo, Margreet ;
Abbink, Jannie J. ;
van 't Hul, Alex J. ;
van Ranst, Dirk ;
Rudolphus, Arjan ;
Weinman, John ;
Rabe, Klaus F. ;
Kaptein, Adrian A. .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 103 (10) :1564-1571
[10]   Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement [J].
Graham, Brian L. ;
Steenbruggen, Irene ;
Barjaktarevic, Igor Z. ;
Cooper, Brendan G. ;
Hall, Graham L. ;
Hallstrand, Teal S. ;
Kaminsky, David A. ;
McCarthy, Kevin ;
McCormack, Meredith C. ;
Miller, Martin R. ;
Oropez, Cristine E. ;
Rosenfeld, Margaret ;
Stanojevic, Sanja ;
Swanney, Maureen P. ;
Thompson, Bruce R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 200 (08) :E70-E88