Choice of Structure, Business Model and Portfolio: Organizational Models of Knowledge Transfer Offices in British Universities

被引:36
作者
Sengupta, Abhijit [1 ]
Ray, Amit S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Essex Business Sch, Colchester, Essex, England
[2] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, Ctr Int Trade & Dev, Delhi, India
关键词
TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER OFFICES; IVORY TOWER; ACADEMIC RESEARCH; PUBLIC RESEARCH; INDUSTRY; UK; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; COMMERCIALIZATION;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8551.12224
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the gap in the knowledge transfer literature around how universities choose specific organizational models for their knowledge transfer offices (KTOs). Organization theory points towards strong interlinkages between strategy, structure and processes in organizations. This motivates an exploration of similar links within the organizational setup of KTOs. In doing so, the paper provides a unified theoretical framework around a university's choice of structure, business model and strategic preferences for their KTOs linked to university-specific contextual factors. A qualitative approach is used wherein four very distinct British universities are examined as individual case studies. The authors find that strategic aims of the university around practitioner engagement, the quantity of applied research and research specialization are key factors in determining the organizational characteristics of the KTO. The theoretical framework derived from the cases makes two key contributions to the university knowledge transfer literature. First, it links the university-level contextual factors to the local model of knowledge transfer. Second, it allows us to develop a set of generic models of knowledge transfer, which can potentially guide universities to develop their own specific models.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 710
页数:24
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
ACS ZJ, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P363
[2]   When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions [J].
Ambos, Tina C. ;
Makela, Kristiina ;
Birkinshaw, Julian ;
D'Este, Pablo .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2008, 45 (08) :1424-1447
[3]   Faculty support for the objectives of university-industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation:: The importance of regional absorptive capacity [J].
Azagra-Caro, JM ;
Archontakis, F ;
Gutiérrez-Gracia, A ;
Fernández-de-Lucio, I .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (01) :37-55
[4]   Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? [J].
Bekkers, Rudi ;
Freitas, Isabel Maria Bodas .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (10) :1837-1853
[5]  
Belcourt M., 2006, Human Resources Management Review, V16, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.011
[6]   University Knowledge Transfer: Private Ownership, Incentives, and Local Development Objectives [J].
Belenzon, Sharon ;
Schankerman, Mark .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2009, 52 (01) :111-144
[7]  
Bercovitz J., 2001, The Journal of Technology Transfer, V26, P21, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1007828026904
[8]   THE ECONOMIC-IMPACT OF INDUSTRY-FUNDED UNIVERSITY R-AND-D [J].
BERMAN, EM .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1990, 19 (04) :349-355
[9]  
Birley S., 2004, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V29, P235, DOI [DOI 10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034121.02507.F3, 10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034121.02507.f3]
[10]   Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers' interactions with industry [J].
Bozeman, Barry ;
Gaughan, Monica .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (05) :694-707