Escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis

被引:13
作者
Kennedy, Sidney H. [1 ]
Andersen, Henning F. [2 ]
Thase, Michael E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] H Lundbeck A S, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Escitalopram; Major depressive disorder; Meta-analysis; Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; PRIMARY-CARE PATIENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; POOLED ANALYSIS; VENLAFAXINE XR; CONTINUATION TREATMENT; EXTENDED-RELEASE; REMISSION RATES; EFFICACY; CITALOPRAM;
D O I
10.1185/03007990802622726
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the relative antidepressant efficacy of escitalopram and comparator antidepressants. Research design and methods: A meta-analysis was performed using studies in major depressive disorder (MDD) comparing escitalopram with active controls, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] (citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline) and serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs] (venlafaxine, duloxetine). Adult patients had to meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the treatment difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at week 8. Secondary outcome measures were response and remission (MADRS total score <= 12) rates. Results: Individual patient data (N = 4549) from 16 randomized controlled trials were included in the analyses (escitalopram n = 2272, SSRIs n = 1750, SNRIs n = 527). Escitalopram was significantly more effective than comparators in overall treatment effect, with an estimated mean treatment difference of 1.1 points on the MADRS (p<0.0001), and in responder (63.7 vs. 58.3%, p<0.0001) and remitter (53.1 vs. 49.4%, p<0.0059) analyses. Escitalopram was significantly superior to SSRIs, with an estimated difference in response of 62.1 vs. 58.4% and remission of 51.6 vs. 49.0%. In comparison to SNRIs, the estimated difference in response was 68.3 vs. 59.0% (p < 0.0007) and for remission the difference was 57.8 vs. 50.5% (p = 0.0088). These results were similar for severely depressed patients (baseline MADRS >= 30). Sensitivity analyses were performed with data from articles reporting Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) scores. The 8-week withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 5.4% for escitalopram and 7.9% for the comparators (p<0.01). This difference was accounted for by statistically significant higher attrition rates in the SNRI comparisons. This work may be limited by the clinical methodology underlying meta-analytic studies, in particular, the exclusion of trials that fail to meet predetermined criteria for inclusion. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, superior efficacy of escitalopram compared to SSRIs and SNRIs was confirmed, although the superiority over SSRIs was largely explained by differences between escitalopram and citalopram.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 175
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [41] Comprehensive analysis of remission (COMPARE) with venlafaxine versus SSRIs
    Nemeroff, Charles B.
    Entsuah, Richard
    Benattia, Isma
    Demitrack, Mark
    Sloan, Diane M.
    Thase, Michael E.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 63 (04) : 424 - 434
  • [42] Duloxetine versus escitalopram and placebo in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder: onset of antidepressant action, a non-inferiority study
    Nierenberg, Andrew A.
    Greist, John H.
    Mallinckrodt, Craig H.
    Prakash, Apurva
    Sambunaris, Angelo
    Tollefson, Gary D.
    Wohlreich, Madelaine M.
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2007, 23 (02) : 401 - 416
  • [43] A meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing reboxetine, a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of major depressive disorder
    Papakostas, George I.
    Nelson, J. Craig
    Kasper, Siegfried
    Moeller, Hans-Juergen
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 18 (02) : 122 - 127
  • [44] Are antidepressant drugs that combine serotonergic and noradrenergic mechanisms of action more effective than the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in treating major depressive disorder? A meta-analysis of studies of newer agents
    Papakostas, George I.
    Thase, Michael E.
    Fava, Maurizio
    Nelson, J. Craig
    Shelton, Richard C.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 62 (11) : 1217 - 1227
  • [45] Rapaport MH, 2004, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V65, P44
  • [46] Differential regulation of serotonin-1A receptor-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding in the dorsal raphe nucleus by citalopram and escitalopram
    Rossi, Dania V.
    Burke, Teresa F.
    Hensler, Julie G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 583 (01) : 103 - 107
  • [47] Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: A STAR*D report
    Rush, A. John
    Trivedi, Madhukar H.
    Wisniewski, Stephen R.
    Nierenberg, Andrew A.
    Stewart, Jonathan W.
    Warden, Diane
    Niederehe, George
    Thase, Michael E.
    Lavori, Philip W.
    Lebowitz, Barry D.
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Rosenbaum, Jerrold F.
    Sackeim, Harold A.
    Kupfer, David J.
    Luther, James
    Fava, Maurizio
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163 (11) : 1905 - 1917
  • [48] The pharmacology of citalopram enantiomers:: The antagonism by R-citalopram on the effect of S-citalopram
    Sanchez, Connie
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 99 (02) : 91 - 95
  • [49] Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants: a meta-analysis
    Smith, D
    Dempster, C
    Glanville, J
    Freemantle, N
    Anderson, I
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 180 : 396 - 404
  • [50] Remission rates during treatment with venlafaxine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
    Thase, ME
    Entsuah, AR
    Rudolph, RL
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 178 : 234 - 241