Prey-specific foraging tactics in a web-building spider

被引:6
作者
Welch, Kelton D. [1 ]
Haynes, Kenneth F. [2 ]
Harwood, James D. [2 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Brookings, SD 57006 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Entomol, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
关键词
Alternative prey; detritivore food web; epigeal predator; flexible foraging; generalist predator; natural enemy; sit-and-wait foraging; web-building spider; LINYPHIID SPIDERS; GENERALIST PREDATORS; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; PEST SUPPRESSION; NATURAL ENEMIES; WINTER-WHEAT; ARANEAE; ALFALFA; FOOD; AVAILABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/afe.12023
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Predator foraging behaviour can have important impacts on trophic-web structure, and on biological control. In agroecosystems, foraging-tactic selection may determine whether the predator feeds on pest or nonpest prey. We examined the foraging behaviour of a flexibly-foraging web-building spider in response to pest (aphids) and nonpest prey (springtails) aiming to assess the potential role of predator foraging behaviour in biological control. Spiders were allowed to choose between simulated microhabitats with and without a given prey item aiming to determine what tactics spiders would use to forage for the given prey. Spiders preferred microhabitats with aphid prey over paired microhabitats with no prey but showed no preference for springtail prey. Spiders rarely constructed webs in response to aphids but frequently utilized web-construction tactics in the presence of springtails. These findings demonstrate that predators can regulate their foraging activity to maximize the consumption of specific prey items. In the many cases where pest and nonpest prey differ in ecology, prey-specific foraging tactics such as these may limit the usefulness of natural enemies in pest suppression: high-quality, nonpest prey may cause shifts in predator behaviour that reduce consumption of pest prey. Therefore, nonpest prey can have behaviour-mediated, indirect effects on biological control.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 381
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Implications of flexible foraging for interspecific interactions: lessons from simple models [J].
Abrams, Peter A. .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 24 (01) :7-17
[2]  
Alderweireldt M., 1994, Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society, V9, P300
[3]   The value of Collembola from agricultural soils as food for a generalist predator [J].
Bilde, T ;
Axelsen, JA ;
Toft, S .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2000, 37 (04) :672-683
[4]  
Birkhofer K, 2007, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V36, P801, DOI 10.1603/0046-225X(2007)36[801:SSPOWS]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
Blackledge TA, 2001, ETHOL ECOL EVOL, V13, P105
[7]   Multiple prey cues induce foraging flexibility in a trap-building predator [J].
Blamires, Sean J. ;
Chao, Yi-Chi ;
Liao, Chen-Pan ;
Tso, I-Min .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2011, 81 (05) :955-961
[8]   Molecular evidence for dietary selectivity and pest suppression potential in an epigeal spider community in winter wheat [J].
Chapman, Eric G. ;
Schmidt, Jason M. ;
Welch, Kelton D. ;
Harwood, James D. .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2013, 65 (01) :72-86
[9]   COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF SPIDER COMMUNITIES IN ALFALFA AND SOYBEAN ECOSYSTEMS - GROUND-SURFACE SPIDERS [J].
CULIN, JD ;
YEARGAN, KV .
ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1983, 76 (05) :832-838
[10]  
D'Arcy C., 1995, Barley yellow dwarf