The New Lithotripsy Index predicts success of shock wave lithotripsy

被引:4
作者
Keskin, Sarp Korcan [1 ,2 ]
Spencer, Mandy [3 ]
Lovegrove, Catherine [1 ]
Turney, Benjamin W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Urol Dept, Oxford, England
[2] Bahcesehir Univ, Dept Urol, Med Sch, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Radiol Dept, Oxford, England
关键词
Urolithiasis; SWL; Treatment; Predictive factor; SMLI; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; STONES;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-022-04215-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors affecting treatment success in patients who underwent Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and to investigate the effect of the Storz Medical Lithotripsy Index (SMLI) on treatment effectiveness. Methods Prospective data were collected on patients undergoing SWL treatment for kidney stones between January 2013 and May 2021. Stone location, number and size were determined with non-contrast CT (NCCT) for all patients. All patients underwent SWL with a Storz Modulith SLK lithotripsy machine without anaesthesia. The total amount of energy applied to the stone was calculated using the SMLI. All patients were evaluated for stone-free status by X-ray at least 2 weeks after treatment. The success of the procedure was defined as the patient being completely stone free or the detection of residual fragments < 4 mm that did not require further treatment. Results A total of 1230 patients with kidney stones were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 42.33 +/- 11.78 (18-75), and the mean BMI was 28.47 +/- 8.78 (19.25-38.52). During SWL, 75.6% of patients demonstrated excellent pain tolerance (930/1230). A total of 116 patients could not tolerate the pain during SWL (9.4%). Treatment success was associated with fewer treatment sessions (2.34 +/- 1.75 vs. 2.90 +/- 2.04; p < 0.001), smaller stone size (7.52 +/- 3.29 vs 8.60 +/- 3.93; p < 0.001) and higher SMLI/stone size (25.11 +/- 13.63 vs. 22.27 +/- 14.50; p < 0.001). In the univariate and multivariate regression analysis, the factors affecting the success of the treatment were the number of sessions (OR 1.170), stone size (OR 1.142), number of shocks (OR 1.005), SMLI/stone size (OR 1.024) and pain tolerance (OR 0.692). Conclusion In the treatment of kidney stones with SWL, stone site, stone size, SMLI/stone size, and pain tolerance are the factors affecting success. SMLI per stone size is a statistically significant factor for predicting SWL success.
引用
收藏
页码:3049 / 3053
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary-tract stones: A large-scale study at a single institution [J].
Abe, T ;
Akakura, K ;
Kawaguchi, M ;
Ueda, T ;
Ichikawa, T ;
Ito, H ;
Nozumi, K ;
Suzuki, K .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (07) :768-773
[2]   Predicting ESWL success by determination of Hounsfield unit on non-contrast CT is clinically irrelevant in children [J].
Akinci, Aykut ;
Akpinar, Cagri ;
Babayigit, Muammer ;
Karaburun, Murat Can ;
Soygur, Tarkan ;
Burgu, Berk .
UROLITHIASIS, 2022, 50 (02) :223-228
[3]   Advances in CT imaging for urolithiasis [J].
Andrabi, Yasir ;
Patino, Manuel ;
Das, Chandan J. ;
Eisner, Brian ;
Sahani, Dushyant V. ;
Kambadakone, Avinash .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 31 (03) :185-193
[4]   Predictors of success following extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in a contemporary cohort [J].
Bajaj, Mohit ;
Smith, Russell ;
Rice, Michael ;
Zargar-Shoshtari, Kamran .
UROLOGY ANNALS, 2021, 13 (03) :282-287
[5]   Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy [J].
Bandi, Gaurav ;
Meiners, Ryan J. ;
Pickhardt, Perry J. ;
Nakada, Stephen Y. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (04) :524-528
[6]   Is there a place for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the endoscopic era? [J].
Chen, Xingfa ;
Chen, Jun ;
Zhou, Xing ;
Long, Qingzhi ;
He, Hui ;
Li, Xiang .
UROLITHIASIS, 2022, 50 (03) :369-374
[7]   The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones [J].
Chung, Vera Y. ;
Turney, Benjamin W. .
UROLITHIASIS, 2016, 44 (05) :441-444
[8]   Efficacy of the lithotripsy in treating lower pole renal stones [J].
Cui, Helen ;
Thomee, Eeke ;
Noble, Jeremy G. ;
Reynard, John M. ;
Turney, Benjamin W. .
UROLITHIASIS, 2013, 41 (03) :231-234
[9]   A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: The value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography [J].
El-Nahas, Ahmed R. ;
El-Assmy, Ahmed M. ;
Mansour, Osama ;
Sheir, Khaled Z. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (06) :1688-1694
[10]   Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi [J].
Fankhauser, Christian D. ;
Hermanns, Thomas ;
Lieger, Laura ;
Diethelm, Olivia ;
Umbehr, Martin ;
Luginbuhl, Thomas ;
Sulser, Tullio ;
Muntener, Michael ;
Poyet, Cedric .
CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2018, 11 (03) :364-369