ERP evidence for memory and predictive mechanisms in word-to-text integration

被引:16
作者
Stafura, Joseph Z. [1 ,2 ]
Rickles, Benjamin [1 ]
Perfetti, Charles A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Learning Res & Dev Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Ctr Neural Basis Cognit, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
text comprehension; integration; lexical association; meaning judgements; ERPs; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; SENTENCE-LEVEL CONTEXT; SEMANTIC CONTEXT; HEMISPHERIC-DIFFERENCES; LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION; SPREADING ACTIVATION; LEXICAL DECISION; MESSAGE-LEVEL; DISCOURSE; RECOGNITION;
D O I
10.1080/23273798.2015.1062119
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
During reading, word-to-text integration (WTI) proceeds quickly and incrementally through both prediction and memory processes. We tested predictive and memory mechanisms with event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded on critical words that were across a sentence boundary from co-referential words that differed in dominant direction of lexical association. For comparison of text comprehension, participants performed meaning judgements on a matched set of word pairs. In both tasks, reduced N400 amplitudes were elicited over central scalp electrodes by words associated in either direction relative to task-specific baseline conditions. A temporal principal component analysis of the ERP data extracted a component reflecting this central N400. Additionally, for the text comprehension task early (N200) and late (parietal N400 and P600) discriminated between forward associated and backward associated conditions. The results demonstrate that, beyond N400 indicators of prediction, ERPs reflect the role of memory processes in WTI across sentences.
引用
收藏
页码:1273 / 1290
页数:18
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   UPDATING A MENTAL MODEL - MAINTAINING BOTH LOCAL AND GLOBAL COHERENCE [J].
ALBRECHT, JE ;
OBRIEN, EJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (05) :1061-1070
[2]   Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference [J].
Altmann, GTM ;
Kamide, Y .
COGNITION, 1999, 73 (03) :247-264
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Event-related potentials: A methods handbook
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, BASIC PROCESSES READ
[5]   Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies [J].
Binder, Jeffrey R. ;
Desai, Rutvik H. ;
Graves, William W. ;
Conant, Lisa L. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2009, 19 (12) :2767-2796
[6]   Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions [J].
Boland, JE ;
Tanenhaus, MK ;
Garnsey, SM ;
Carlson, GN .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 34 (06) :774-806
[7]   Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing [J].
Bookheimer, S .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 25 :151-188
[8]   THE PROCESSING NATURE OF THE N400 - EVIDENCE FROM MASKED PRIMING [J].
BROWN, C ;
HAGOORT, P .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 5 (01) :34-44
[9]   Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
New, Boris .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :977-990
[10]   The P600 reflects cost of new information in discourse memory [J].
Burkhardt, Petra .
NEUROREPORT, 2007, 18 (17) :1851-1854