Reliability analysis with scarce information: Comparing alternative approaches in a geotechnical engineering context

被引:115
作者
Beer, Michael [1 ]
Zhang, Yi [2 ]
Quek, Ser Tong [2 ]
Phoon, Kok Kwang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Inst Risk & Uncertainty, Liverpool L69 3GQ, Merseyside, England
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
关键词
Reliability analysis; Scarce information; Geotechnical engineering; Interval analysis; Imprecise probabilities; UNCERTAINTY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.10.003
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper the problem of dealing with scarce information in a reliability analysis is investigated in a geotechnical engineering context. Common probabilistic methods are compared with interval analysis as an alternative non-probabilistic approach. The potential of imprecise probabilities is discussed as an option for combining probabilistic and non-probabilistic information. The selected methods are examined in view of (i) an appropriate modeling of the information actually available in practical cases, (ii) the transfer of the uncertainty to the computational results, and (iii) the interpretation of the results. Key issue of this investigation is the meaning of the results as the basis to derive engineering decisions if only scarce information is available. This involves particular attention to low-probability-but-high-consequence events, which are often essential for risk assessment. A retaining wall structure is adopted for this study, and the failure mechanisms are considered as known in a deterministic form. This describes the input-to-output transformation of the available information in all cases. Representative available information about the parameters of the retaining wall problem is taken from literature, and typical practical specifications for the parameters are considered. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P 6 INT C COMP STOCH
[2]  
Auer E., 2010, P WORKSH THEOR BEL F
[3]   On the impact of robust statistics on imprecise probability models: A review [J].
Augustin, Thomas ;
Hable, Robert .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2010, 32 (06) :358-365
[4]  
Baecher G., 2008, RELIABILITY STAT GEO
[5]  
Beer Michael, 2009, International Journal of Reliability and Safety, V3, P174, DOI 10.1504/IJRS.2009.026840
[6]  
Beer M., 2009, Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science vol, V6, P4047
[7]  
Beer M, SOFT COMPUT IN PRESS
[8]   Predicting displacement of augered cast-in-place piles based on load test database [J].
Ching, Jianye ;
Chen, Jie-Ru .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2010, 32 (06) :372-383
[9]  
Ching JY, 2011, TC304 ENG PRACTICE R
[10]   Improving interval analysis in finite element calculations by means of affine arithmetic [J].
Degrauwe, D. ;
Lombaert, G. ;
De Roeck, G. .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2010, 88 (3-4) :247-254