Changing the field: A Bourdieusian analysis of educational practices that support equitable outcomes among minoritized youth on two informal science learning programs
被引:25
作者:
Archer, Louise
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, EnglandUCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, England
Archer, Louise
[1
]
Godec, Spela
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, EnglandUCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, England
Godec, Spela
[1
]
Calabrese Barton, Angela
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Michigan, Sch Educ, Educ Studies Dept, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, England
Calabrese Barton, Angela
[2
]
Dawson, Emily
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UCL, Sci & Technol Studies, London, EnglandUCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, England
Dawson, Emily
[3
]
Mau, Ada
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, EnglandUCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, England
Mau, Ada
[1
]
Patel, Uma
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, EnglandUCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, England
Patel, Uma
[1
]
机构:
[1] UCL, Inst Educ, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, England
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Educ, Educ Studies Dept, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
Supporting more equitable participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) remains a key, persistent educational challenge. This paper employs a sociological Bourdieusian lens to explore how equitable youth outcomes might be supported through informal science learning (ISL). Drawing on multimodal, ethnographic data from four case study youth aged 11-14 from two ISL programs, we identify four areas of practice that were enacted to a greater or lesser extent in the programs in support of equitable youth outcomes. We identify how the equitable potential of these practices was realized through a disruption of dominant power relations. It is argued that ISL should focus on changing the field, rather than young people. Affordances and limitations of the Bourdieusian lens are discussed.