Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The USpella Registry

被引:105
|
作者
Maini, Brijeshwar [1 ]
Naidu, Srihari S. [2 ]
Mulukutla, Suresh [3 ]
Kleiman, Neal [4 ]
Schreiber, Theodore [5 ]
Wohns, David [6 ]
Dixon, Simon [7 ]
Rihal, Charanjit [8 ]
Dave, Rajesh [1 ]
O'Neill, William [9 ]
机构
[1] Pinnacle Hlth Syst, Harrisburg, PA USA
[2] Winthrop Univ Hosp, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Methodist Debakey Heart & Vasc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[5] Harper Univ Hosp, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Spectrum Hlth, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[7] William Beaumont Univ Hosp, Royal Oak, MI USA
[8] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[9] Univ Miami, Miami, FL USA
关键词
impella; 2; 5; high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; percutaneous left ventricular assist device; circulatory support; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; LONG-TERM SAFETY; MULTIVESSEL DISEASE; BYPASS-SURGERY; ASSIST DEVICE; REVASCULARIZATION; FEASIBILITY; ARTS;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.23403
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: We report on the real-world, multicenter experience of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system during high-risk PCI, a subset of the larger USpella Registry. Background: Standard of care for most patients with compromised ventricular function with multivessel or high-risk coronary lesions has been coronary artery bypass grafting. In poor operative candidates, high-risk PCI is increasingly considered, despite an increased risk for periprocedural hemodynamic compromise. Methods: 175 consecutive patients who underwent high-risk PCI with prophylactic support of the Impella 2.5 were evaluated. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included safety and efficacy related to the device and patient outcomes, including survival at 12 months. Results: Overall angiographic revascularization was successful in 99% of patients and in 90% of those with multivessel revascularization, resulting in a reduction of the mean SYNTAX score post-PCI from 36 +/- 15 to 18 +/- 15 (P < 0.0001) and an improvement of the ejection fraction (from 31 +/- 15% to 36 +/- 14%, P < 0.0001). In 51% of patients, the functional status improved by one or more NYHA class (P < 0.001). At 30-day follow-up, the rate of MACE was 8%, and survival was 96%, 91%, and 88% at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: The use of Impella 2.5 in high-risk PCI appeared feasible and safe in the real-world setting. The utilization of the Impella 2.5 was successful, resulting in favorable short- and midterm angiographic, procedural and clinical outcomes. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 725
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the impella recover LP 2.5 device
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Remmelink, Maurice
    Vis, Marije M.
    van der Schaaf, Rene J.
    Koch, Karel T.
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    Tijssen, Jan G.
    Piek, Jan J.
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    Henriques, Jose P.
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (18) : 643 - 643
  • [42] Circulatory support with Impella CP device during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: initial experience in Poland
    Dudek, Dariusz
    Rakowski, Tomasz
    Sukiennik, Adam
    Hawranek, Michal
    Dziewierz, Artur
    Kubica, Jacek
    Suwalski, Piotr
    Gil, Robert
    Wojakowski, Wojciech
    Ochala, Andrzej
    Mazurek, Wieslaw
    Zmudka, Krzysztof
    Gasior, Mariusz
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2016, 12 (03): : 254 - 257
  • [43] Avoiding Hemodynamic Collapse During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Advanced Hemodynamics of Impella Support
    Verma, Sanjay
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    O'Neill, William W.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 89 (04) : 672 - 675
  • [44] Impella support for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center experience
    Brandao, Mariana
    Caeiro, Daniel
    Pires-Morais, Gustavo
    Almeida, Joao Goncalves
    Teixeira, Pedro Goncalves
    Silva, Marisa Passos
    Ponte, Marta
    Dias, Adelaide
    Oliveira, Marco
    Rodrigues, Alberto
    Braga, Pedro
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2021, 40 (11) : 853 - 861
  • [45] Mechanical circulatory support during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in a young male patient
    Pawlik, Artur
    Kleczynski, Pawel
    Dudek, Dariusz
    Dziewierz, Artur
    Bartus, Stanislaw
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2020, 16 (03): : 347 - 348
  • [46] Pulsatile iVAC 2L circulatory support in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    den Uil, Corstiaan A.
    Daemen, Joost
    Lenzen, Mattie J.
    Maugenest, Anne-Marie
    Joziasse, Linda
    van Geuns, Robert Jan
    Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2017, 12 (14) : 1689 - 1696
  • [47] Predictors of the Need for Continuous Impella Support in High Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Sharma, Saurabh
    Palacios, Igor
    O'Neill, William
    Witzke, Christian F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (18) : B50 - B50
  • [48] Clinical Predictors of Impella Dependence During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Sanborn, Luke
    Laifman, Eric
    Huang, Christie
    Tun, Han
    Matthews, Ray
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (04) : S25 - S25
  • [49] A Review of Bleeding Risk with Impella-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Vetrovec, George W.
    Kaki, Amir
    Dahle, Thom G.
    HEART INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 14 (02): : 92 - 99
  • [50] High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in three-vessel coronary artery disease and aortic stenosis with Impella support
    Bendetti, Alice
    D'Angelo, Livio
    Masiero, Giulia
    Fraccaro, Chiara
    Pavei, Andrea
    Napodano, Massimo
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2020, 22 (0N) : N52 - N52