Gingival Margin Changes in Maxillary Anterior Sites After Single Immediate Implant Placement and Provisionalization: A 5-Year Retrospective Study of 47 Patients

被引:33
|
作者
Ross, Scott B. [1 ]
Pette, Gregory A. [1 ]
Parker, William B. [1 ]
Hardigan, Patrick [2 ]
机构
[1] Nova SE Univ, Dept Periodont, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33328 USA
[2] Nova SE Univ, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33328 USA
关键词
dental implants; esthetics; gingival biotype; gingival recession; immediate implant placement; immediate loading; immediate provisionalization; FRESH EXTRACTION SOCKETS; TOOTH IMPLANTS; AESTHETIC OUTCOMES; RESTORATION; POSTEXTRACTION; REPLACEMENT; STABILITY;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.3124
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate gingival margin changes in the esthetic zone after immediate implant placement and provisionalization over 5 years with a custom anatomic provisional abutment. Materials and Methods: Single maxillary incisor immediate implant placement and provisionalization procedures, completed and followed between February 2006 and August 2006, were analyzed retrospectively. During clinical recalls at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years, changes in gingival margins were recorded with clinical photographs and recorded in millimeters. Results: Forty-seven patients each received a single implant (19 central incisors, 28 lateral incisors) and were followed for 5 years. Implants and restorations had a 100% survival rate during the study. The mean gingival margin changes (recession) were 0.17 mm at the time of definitive restoration, 0.27 mm at 3 months, 0.30 mm at 1 year, and 0.30 mm at 5 years. After 5 years, 24 of the 47 implant crowns had no significant gingival recession. All central incisor sites received 4.3-mm-diameter implants and had a mean change in tooth length of 0.03 mm at 5 years. Lateral incisor sites (n = 28) received either a 3.5-mm-diameter implant (n = 20) or a 4.3-mm-diameter implant (n = 8). Lateral sites with the 3.5-mm implant had a mean change in gingival margin height of 0.08 mm of tooth length at 5 years; lateral sites with a 4.3-mm platform displayed a mean change of 0.82 mm of tooth length. Conclusion: This study suggests that implant diameter, gingival biotype, surgical technique, and/or the reason for tooth loss can influence the amount of gingival recession occurring over 5 years. Most recession occurred within the first 3 months, between implant placement/provisionalization and definitive restoration. The use of a customized anatomic provisional abutment can reduce the amount and frequency of recession.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 134
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The facial-coronal ridge crest alterations after single immediate implant placement and provisionalization with thin buccal plate phenotype in anterior maxilla: A radiographic case-series study
    Yi, Chun
    Jiang, Xi
    Di, Ping
    Ren, Shuxin
    Lin, Ye
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (02) : 317 - 326
  • [22] Interforaminal implant placement in oral cancer patients: during ablative surgery or delayed? A 5-year retrospective study
    Mizbah, K.
    Dings, J. P.
    Kaanders, J. H. A. M.
    van den Hoogen, F. J. A.
    Koole, R.
    Meijer, G. J.
    Merkx, M. A. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 42 (05) : 651 - 655
  • [23] Buccal bone thickness at dental implants in the maxillary anterior region with large bony defects at time of immediate implant placement: A 1-year cohort study
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Slagter, Kirsten W.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [24] Immediate and early implant placement in single-tooth gaps in the anterior maxilla: A prospective study on ridge dimensional, clinical, and aesthetic changes
    Arora, Himanshu
    Ivanovski, Saso
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (11) : 1143 - 1154
  • [25] Facial Gingival Changes With and Without Socket Gap Grafting Following Single Maxillary Anterior Immediate Tooth Replacement: One-Year Results
    Yuenyongorarn, Pakpoom
    Kan, Joseph Y. K.
    Rungcharassaeng, Kitichai
    Matsuda, Hiroyuki
    Roe, Phillip
    Lozada, Jaime L.
    Caruso, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2020, 46 (05) : 496 - 505
  • [26] 3D Considerations and Outcomes of Immediate Single Implant Insertion and Provisionalization at the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Long-Term Retrospective Follow-Up Study of Up to 18 Years
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    Barone, Antonio
    Cinar, Ihsan Caglar
    Nagy, Katalin
    Shacham, Maayan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (18)
  • [27] Modified Insertion Technique for Immediate Implant Placement into Fresh Extraction Socket in the First Maxillary Molar Sites: A 3-Year Prospective Study
    Acocella, Alessandro
    Bertolai, Roberto
    Sacco, Roberto
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2010, 19 (03) : 220 - 228
  • [28] Tissue Dimensional Changes in Single-Tooth Immediate Extraction Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone: A Retrospective Clinical Study
    Amato, Francesco
    Polara, Giorgio
    Spedicato, Giorgio Alfredo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (02) : 439 - 447
  • [29] Facial bone alterations on maxillary anterior single implants for immediate placement and provisionalization following tooth extraction: a superimposed cone beam computed tomography study
    Morimoto, Taichiro
    Tsukiyama, Yoshihiro
    Morimoto, Keizo
    Koyano, Kiyoshi
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (12) : 1383 - 1389
  • [30] Correlation between alveolar bone morphology and volumetric dimensional changes in immediate maxillary implant placement: A 1-year prospective cohort study
    Borges, Tiago
    Fernandes, Danilo
    Almeida, Bruno
    Pereira, Miguel
    Martins, David
    Azevedo, Luis
    Marques, Tiago
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2020, 91 (09) : 1167 - 1176