A novel technique for cervical gastro-oesophageal anastomosis during minimally invasive oesophagectomy

被引:11
|
作者
Wang, Zhi-Qiang
Jiang, Yue-Quan [1 ]
Xu, Wei
Cai, Hua-Rong
Zhang, Zhi
Yin, Zhe
Zhang, Qi
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ Canc Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
关键词
Oesophageal carcinoma; Minimally invasive oesophagectomy; Anastomosis; Complications; MECHANICAL ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS; HAND-SEWN; CANCER; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; ESOPHAGUS; STRICTURE; LEAK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.072
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anastomotic leakage, fibrous stricture and gastro-oesophageal reflux are three major complications of gastro-oesophageal anastomosis, particularly in cervical anastomosis. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel cervical anastomosis technique (NA) by comparing it to traditional side-to-side anastomosis (SS) and end-to-side anastomosis using a circular stapler (CS) in terms of postoperative leakage, stricture and reflux. Methods: A total of 390 patients with thoracic oesophageal cancer underwent minimally invasive oesophagectomy with cervical anastomosis (192 with NA, 34 with SS and 164 with CS) in our institute from January 2013 and May 2016. A detailed description of the surgical procedure is provided, and the major postoperative complications, including postoperative leakage, stricture and reflux, were compared using a three-armed controlled study. Results: The anastomotic method was an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage, as well as stricture and reflux. The rate of anastomotic leakage of the NA group (1.0%) was significantly lower than that in the SS group (8.8%, P = 0.025) and in the CS group (8.5%, P = 0.001). The rate of anastomotic stricture in the NA group was not significantly different than that in the SS group (1.5% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.368) but was significantly lower than that in the CS group (1.5% vs. 18.9%, P < 0.001). The incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the NA group was significantly lower than that in the SS group and the CS group (5.7% vs. 23.5% and 18.3%, P = 0.003 and 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Jiang's anastomosis technique remarkably reduces the incidence of gastro-oesophageal anastomotic leakage, stricture and reflux, and it is a safe and effective technique for minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 229
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Severe weight loss after minimally invasive oesophagectomy is associated with poor survival in patients with oesophageal cancer at 5 years
    Yasufumi Koterazawa
    Taro Oshikiri
    Gosuke Takiguchi
    Naoki Urakawa
    Hiroshi Hasegawa
    Masashi Yamamoto
    Shingo Kanaji
    Kimihiro Yamashita
    Takeru Matsuda
    Tetsu Nakamura
    Satoshi Suzuki
    Yoshihiro Kakeji
    BMC Gastroenterology, 20
  • [42] A novel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique: safety and efficacy report
    Hu, Guanghui
    Guo, Zhuifeng
    Liu, Huan
    Luo, Ming
    Liu, Min
    Lai, Peng
    Zhang, Haimin
    Yuan, Jing
    Yao, Xudong
    Zheng, Junhua
    Xu, Yunfei
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 49 (02) : 174 - 180
  • [43] Assessing the relationships between health-related quality of life and postoperative length of hospital stay after oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus and the gastro-oesophageal junction†
    Nafteux, Philippe
    Durnez, Joke
    Moons, Johnny
    Coosemans, Willy
    Decker, Georges
    Lerut, Toni
    Van Veer, Hans
    De Leyn, Paul
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 44 (03) : 525 - 533
  • [44] Feasibility, safety and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive oesophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma - Experience from a tertiary care centre
    Surendran, Suraj
    Midha, Geet
    Paul, Negine
    Yacob, Myla
    Abraham, Vijay
    Mathew, Manu
    Sasidharan, Balu
    Gunasingam, Rajesh
    Pavamani, Simon
    Irodi, Aparna
    Mani, Thenmozhi
    Samarasam, Inian
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2022, 18 (04) : 545 - 556
  • [45] How to distinguish thoracic and cervical lymph nodes during minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Zeng, Taidui
    Chen, Maohui
    Cai, Bingqiang
    Zheng, Wei
    Xu, Chi
    Xu, Guobing
    Chen, Chun
    Zheng, Bin
    THORACIC CANCER, 2022, 13 (17) : 2436 - 2442
  • [46] Meta-analysis of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer
    Kauppila, J. H.
    Xie, S.
    Johar, A.
    Markar, S. R.
    Lagergren, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (09) : 1131 - 1140
  • [47] Initial experience with modified en bloc robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy for thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Sun, Hai-Bo
    Liu, Xian-Ben
    Xing, Wen-Qun
    Chen, Pei-Nan
    Liu, Shi-Lei
    Li, Peng
    Ma, Ya-Xing
    Feng, Shao-Kang
    Jiang, Duo
    Yan, Sen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2023, 19 (03)
  • [48] Two-lung ventilation during prone minimally invasive thorascopic oesophagectomy A case series
    Haagh, Timo J.
    Buise, Marc P.
    Luyer, Misha D. P.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (04) : 307 - 309
  • [49] Rationalisation of the surgical technique for minimally invasive laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after previous total colectomy for ulcerative colitis
    Giudici, Francesco
    Scaringi, Stefano
    Di Martino, Carmela
    Ficari, Ferdinando
    Bechi, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2017, 13 (03) : 188 - 199
  • [50] Dupuytren's Disease: A Novel Minimally Invasive Pull-Through Technique
    Maruccia, Michele
    Tedeschi, Pasquale
    Sisto, Francesco
    Converti, Ilaria
    Giudice, Giuseppe
    Elia, Rossella
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2024, 51 (03): : 295 - 303