A novel technique for cervical gastro-oesophageal anastomosis during minimally invasive oesophagectomy

被引:11
|
作者
Wang, Zhi-Qiang
Jiang, Yue-Quan [1 ]
Xu, Wei
Cai, Hua-Rong
Zhang, Zhi
Yin, Zhe
Zhang, Qi
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ Canc Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
关键词
Oesophageal carcinoma; Minimally invasive oesophagectomy; Anastomosis; Complications; MECHANICAL ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS; HAND-SEWN; CANCER; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; ESOPHAGUS; STRICTURE; LEAK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.072
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anastomotic leakage, fibrous stricture and gastro-oesophageal reflux are three major complications of gastro-oesophageal anastomosis, particularly in cervical anastomosis. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel cervical anastomosis technique (NA) by comparing it to traditional side-to-side anastomosis (SS) and end-to-side anastomosis using a circular stapler (CS) in terms of postoperative leakage, stricture and reflux. Methods: A total of 390 patients with thoracic oesophageal cancer underwent minimally invasive oesophagectomy with cervical anastomosis (192 with NA, 34 with SS and 164 with CS) in our institute from January 2013 and May 2016. A detailed description of the surgical procedure is provided, and the major postoperative complications, including postoperative leakage, stricture and reflux, were compared using a three-armed controlled study. Results: The anastomotic method was an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage, as well as stricture and reflux. The rate of anastomotic leakage of the NA group (1.0%) was significantly lower than that in the SS group (8.8%, P = 0.025) and in the CS group (8.5%, P = 0.001). The rate of anastomotic stricture in the NA group was not significantly different than that in the SS group (1.5% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.368) but was significantly lower than that in the CS group (1.5% vs. 18.9%, P < 0.001). The incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the NA group was significantly lower than that in the SS group and the CS group (5.7% vs. 23.5% and 18.3%, P = 0.003 and 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Jiang's anastomosis technique remarkably reduces the incidence of gastro-oesophageal anastomotic leakage, stricture and reflux, and it is a safe and effective technique for minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 229
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma
    Nafteux, Philippe
    Moons, Johnny
    Coosemans, Willy
    Decaluwe, Herbert
    Decker, Georges
    De Leyn, Paul
    Van Raemdonck, Dirk
    Lerut, Toni
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 40 (06) : 1455 - 1464
  • [2] Completely minimally invasive versus hybrid Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy for oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer: a UK multi-centre comparative study
    Krashna Patel
    Alan Askari
    Omar Abbassi
    Naga Venkatesh Jayanthi
    Oliver Claydon
    James Laycock
    Aravindh Ramalingam
    Bhaskar Kumar
    Joshua Wong
    Mohamed Aly
    Periyathambi Jambulingam
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 (8) : 5822 - 5832
  • [3] Completely minimally invasive versus hybrid Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy for oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer: a UK multi-centre comparative study
    Patel, Krashna
    Askari, Alan
    Abbassi, Omar
    Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh
    Claydon, Oliver
    Laycock, James
    Ramalingam, Aravindh
    Kumar, Bhaskar
    Wong, Joshua
    Aly, Mohamed
    Jambulingam, Periyathambi
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (08): : 5822 - 5832
  • [4] Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy: Preliminary Results after Introduction of an Intrathoracic Anastomosis
    van Workum, Frans
    van den Wildenberg, Frits J. H.
    Polat, Fatih
    de Wilt, Johannes H. W.
    Rosman, Camiel
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 31 (02) : 95 - 103
  • [5] Oesophagectomy for tumours and dysplasia of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction
    Epari, Krishna
    Cade, Richard
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 79 (04) : 251 - 257
  • [6] Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer
    Xiong, Wen-Ling
    Li, Rui
    Lei, Hai-Ke
    Jiang, Zheng-Ying
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (03) : 165 - 170
  • [7] Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Liu, He
    Shan, Limei
    Wang, Jian
    Zhai, Rong
    Zhu, Yining
    Yao, Fei
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (02): : 891 - 901
  • [8] Oesophagectomy: The expanding role of minimally invasive surgery in oesophageal cancer
    van den Berg, J. W.
    Luketich, J. D.
    Cheong, E.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 36-37 : 75 - 80
  • [9] Minimally invasive surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and future perspectives
    Birla, Rodica
    Hoara, Petre
    Achim, Florin
    Dinca, Valeriu
    Ciuc, Diana
    Constantinoiu, Silviu
    Constantin, Adrian
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 15 (10) : 1675 - 1690
  • [10] McKeown-cervical anastomosis in minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Takeda, Flavio Roberto
    Sallum, Rubens Antonio Aissar
    Fernandes, Felipe Alexandre
    Cecconello, Ivan
    ANNALS OF ESOPHAGUS, 2022, 5