Population-based relative risks for specific family history constellations of breast cancer

被引:12
作者
Albright, Frederick S. [1 ]
Kohlmann, Wendy [2 ]
Neumayer, Leigh [3 ,4 ]
Buys, Saundra S. [2 ,5 ]
Matsen, Cindy B. [2 ,5 ]
Kaphingst, Kimberly A. [2 ,6 ]
Cannon-Albright, Lisa A. [2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmacotherapy, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Hlth Sci Ctr, Huntsman Canc Inst, 391 Chipeta Way,Suite D, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Tucson, AZ USA
[5] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Oncol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Univ Utah, Coll Humanities, Dept Commun, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Genet Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[8] George E Wahlen Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT 84148 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Breast cancer; Relative risk; UPDB; Family history; Individualized risk; SOCIETY; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES; OVARIAN; WOMEN; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-019-01171-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeUsing a large resource linking genealogy with decades of cancer data, a non-traditional approach was used to estimate individualized risk for breast cancer (BC) based on specific family history extending to first cousins, providing a clearer picture of the contribution of various aspects of both close and distant combinations of affected relatives.MethodsRRs for BC were estimated in 640,366 females for a representative set of breast cancer family history constellations that included number of first- (FDR), second-(SDR), and third-degree relatives (TDR), maternal and paternal relatives, and age at earliest diagnosis in a relative.ResultsRRs for first-degree relatives of BC cases ranged from 1.61 (=1 FDR affected, CI 1.56, 1.67) to 5.00 (4 FDRs affected, CI 3.35, 7.18). RRs for second-degree relatives of probands with 0 affected FDRs ranged from 1.04 (=1 SDR affected, CI 1.00, 1.08) to 1.71 (4 SDRs affected, CI 1.26, 2.27) and for second-degree relatives of probands with exactly 1 FDR from 1.54 (0 SDRs affected, CI 1.47, 1.61) to 4.78 (5 SDRs; CI 2.47, 8.35). RRs for third-degree relatives with no closer relatives affected were significantly elevated over population risk for probands with5 affected TDRs RR=1.32, CI 1.11, 1.57).ConclusionsThe majority of females in the Utah resource had a positive family history of BC in FDRs to TDRs. Presence of any number of affected FDRs or SDRs significantly increased risk for BC over population risk; and more than four TDRs, even with no affected FDRs or SDRs, significantly increased risk over population risk. Risk prediction derived from the specific and extended family history constellation of affected relatives allows identification of females at increased risk even when they do not have a conventionally defined high-risk family; these risks could be a powerful, efficient tool to individualize cancer screening and prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 590
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1990, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA
[2]   Risk estimates for complex disorders: comparing personal genome testing and family history [J].
Aiyar, Lila ;
Shuman, Cheryl ;
Hayeems, Robin ;
Dupuis, Annie ;
Pu, Shuye ;
Wodak, Shoshana ;
Chitayat, David ;
Velsher, Lea ;
Davies, Jill .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 16 (03) :231-237
[3]   Prostate Cancer Risk Prediction Based on Complete Prostate Cancer Family History [J].
Albright, Frederick ;
Stephenson, Robert A. ;
Agarwal, Neeraj ;
Teerlink, Craig C. ;
Lowrance, William T. ;
Farnham, James M. ;
Albright, Lisa A. Cannon .
PROSTATE, 2015, 75 (04) :390-398
[4]  
Albright FS, 2016, RELATIVE RISKS LETHA, DOI [10. 1002/pros. 23247, DOI 10.1002/PR0S.23247]
[5]   Utah family-based analysis: Past, present and future [J].
Albright, Lisa A. Cannon .
HUMAN HEREDITY, 2008, 65 (04) :209-220
[6]   Assessing Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer: A Review of Risk Assessment Models [J].
Amir, Eitan ;
Freedman, Orit C. ;
Seruga, Bostjan ;
Evans, D. Gareth .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (10) :680-691
[7]   Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease [J].
Beral, V ;
Bull, D ;
Doll, R ;
Peto, R ;
Reeves, G .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9291) :1389-1399
[8]   Association of Direct-to-Consumer Genome-Wide Disease Risk Estimates and Self-Reported Disease [J].
Bloss, Cinnamon S. ;
Topol, Eric J. ;
Schork, Nicholas J. .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 36 (01) :66-70
[9]   Family history and risk of breast cancer: an analysis accounting for family structure [J].
Brewer, Hannah R. ;
Jones, Michael E. ;
Schoemaker, Minouk J. ;
Ashworth, Alan ;
Swerdlow, Anthony J. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 165 (01) :193-200
[10]   Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications [J].
Cintolo-Gonzalez, Jessica A. ;
Braun, Danielle ;
Blackford, Amanda L. ;
Mazzola, Emanuele ;
Acar, Ahmet ;
Plichta, Jennifer K. ;
Griffin, Molly ;
Hughes, Kevin S. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (02) :263-284