Coupling Load-Following Control With OPF

被引:9
作者
Bazrafshan, Mohammadhafez [1 ]
Gatsis, Nikolaos [1 ]
Taha, Ahmad F. [1 ]
Taylor, Joshua A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas San Antonio, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Edward S Rogers Sr Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Toronto, ON M5S3G4, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Optimal power flow; load-following control; linear quadratic regulator; semidefinite programming; DYNAMIC STATE ESTIMATION; FREQUENCY CONTROL; DISTRIBUTED CONTROL; POWER; STABILITY; SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; METHODOLOGY; SECONDARY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1109/TSG.2018.2802723
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In this paper, the optimal power flow (OPF) problem is augmented to account for the costs associated with the load-following control of a power network. Load-following control costs are expressed through the linear quadratic regulator (LQR). The power network is described by a set of nonlinear differential algebraic equations (DAEs). By linearizing the DAEs around a known equilibrium, a linearized OPF that accounts for steadystate operational constraints is formulated first. This linearized OPF is then augmented by a set of linear matrix inequalities that are algebraically equivalent to the implementation of an LQR controller. The resulting formulation, termed LQR-OPF, is a semidefinite program which furnishes optimal steady-state setpoints and an optimal feedback law to steer the system to the new steady state with minimum load-following control costs. Numerical tests demonstrate that the setpoints computed by LQR-OPF result in lower overall costs and frequency deviations compared to the setpoints of a scheme where OPF and load-following control are considered separately.
引用
收藏
页码:2495 / 2506
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Distributed Control of Networked Dynamical Systems: Static Feedback, Integral Action and Consensus [J].
Andreasson, Martin ;
Dimarogonas, Dimos V. ;
Sandberg, Henrik ;
Johansson, Karl Henrik .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2014, 59 (07) :1750-1764
[2]   Semidefinite programming duality and linear time-invariant systems [J].
Balakrishnan, V ;
Vandenberghe, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2003, 48 (01) :30-41
[3]  
Bazrafshan M., 2017, LQR OPF
[4]  
Boyd S.P., 1994, LINEAR MATRIX INEQUA, V15
[5]   Time-Scale Modeling of Wind-Integrated Power Systems [J].
Chandra, Souvik ;
Gayme, Dennice F. ;
Chakrabortty, Aranya .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (06) :4712-4721
[6]   A TOOLBOX FOR POWER-SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND CONTROL ENGINEERING-EDUCATION AND RESEARCH [J].
CHOW, JH ;
CHEUNG, KW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1992, 7 (04) :1559-1564
[7]   A Particle Filter for Dynamic State Estimation in Multi-Machine Systems With Detailed Models [J].
Cui, Yinan ;
Kavasseri, Rajesh .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2015, 30 (06) :3377-3385
[8]   Gather-and-broadcast frequency control in power systems [J].
Dorfler, Florian ;
Grammatico, Sergio .
AUTOMATICA, 2017, 79 :296-305
[9]   Breaking the Hierarchy: Distributed Control and Economic Optimality in Microgrids [J].
Dorfler, Florian ;
Simpson-Porco, John W. ;
Bullo, Francesco .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS, 2016, 3 (03) :241-253
[10]   MEGAWATT-FREQUENCY CONTROL PROBLEM - A NEW APPROACH VIA OPTIMAL CONTROL THEORY [J].
FOSHA, CE ;
ELGERD, OI .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1970, PA89 (04) :563-+