Inducing institutional change through projects? Three models of projectified governance

被引:28
作者
af Rosenschold, Johan Munck [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Social Sci, TINT, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci HELSUS, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Governance; project; projectification; institutional change; environment; ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE; RETHINKING; INNOVATION; NETWORKS; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1080/1523908X.2019.1606702
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The study of short-term projects in policy implementation has lately gained ground among scholars of environmental governance and public administration. The increasing reliance on and prevalence of projects, or 'projectification', has spurred critical debates on the ability of projects to contribute to long-term goals, including sustainability, as well as institutional change. Yet, the literature on projectification lacks specificity in terms of how projects are understood, how the relationship between projects and permanent organizations looks like, and how projects can influence institutional orders. The aim of this paper is to systematize the literature in order to uncover the processes of transforming project outputs into institutional change. Three models of projectified governance - mechanistic, organic, and adaptive - is presented, providing a conceptual apparatus that advances the study of projects in environmental policy and governance. The paper argues that the adaptive model, with its reliance on multi-scalar networks for the coordination of project activities and knowledge, shows most promise in achieving institutional change to address complex environmental problems.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 344
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[11]  
Baumgartner F. R., 1993, Agendas and Instability in American Politics
[12]   Analysing institutional change in environmental governance: exploring the concept of 'institutional work' [J].
Beunen, R. ;
Patterson, J. J. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 62 (01) :12-29
[13]   Applying institutional theories to managing megaprojects [J].
Biesenthal, Christopher ;
Clegg, Stewart ;
Mahalingam, Ashwin ;
Sankaran, Shankar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 36 (01) :43-54
[14]   Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems [J].
Bodin, Orjan .
SCIENCE, 2017, 357 (6352) :659-+
[15]   Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning [J].
Brady, T ;
Davies, A .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2004, 25 (09) :1601-1621
[16]  
Bttner Sebastian M., 2016, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, V3, P41, DOI [10.1080/23254823.2016.1183503, DOI 10.1080/23254823.2016.1183503, https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2016.1183503]
[17]   Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the 'urban' politics of climate change [J].
Bulkeley, H ;
Betsill, MM .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2005, 14 (01) :42-63
[18]  
Burns T, 1961, The Management of Innovation
[19]   Project Networks: Governance Choices and Paradoxical Tensions [J].
DeFillippi, Robert ;
Sydow, Jorg .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 47 (05) :6-17
[20]   Governance and complexity - Emerging issues for governance theory [J].
Duit, Andreas ;
Galaz, Victor .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2008, 21 (03) :311-335