Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass-Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol

被引:476
作者
Elbrecht, Vasco [1 ]
Leese, Florian [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Anim Ecol Evolut & Biodivers, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 07期
关键词
BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT; TRICHOPTERA; MACROINVERTEBRATES; ARTHROPODS; INSIGHTS; BARCODE; SCIENCE; SAMPLES; LIFE; PCR;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0130324
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Metabarcoding is an emerging genetic tool to rapidly assess biodiversity in ecosystems. It involves high-throughput sequencing of a standard gene from an environmental sample and comparison to a reference database. However, no consensus has emerged regarding laboratory pipelines to screen species diversity and infer species abundances from environmental samples. In particular, the effect of primer bias and the detection limit for specimens with a low biomass has not been systematically examined, when processing samples in bulk. We developed and tested a DNA metabarcoding protocol that utilises the standard cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) barcoding fragment to detect freshwater macroinverte-brate taxa. DNA was extracted in bulk, amplified in a single PCR step, and purified, and the libraries were directly sequenced in two independent MiSeq runs (300-bp paired-end reads). Specifically, we assessed the influence of specimen biomass on sequence read abundance by sequencing 31 specimens of a stonefly species with known haplotypes spanning three orders of magnitude in biomass (experiment I). Then, we tested the recovery of 52 different freshwater invertebrate taxa of similar biomass using the same standard barcoding primers (experiment II). Each experiment was replicated ten times to maximise statistical power. The results of both experiments were consistent across replicates. We found a distinct positive correlation between species biomass and resulting numbers of MiSeq reads. Furthermore, we reliably recovered 83% of the 52 taxa used to test primer bias. However, sequence abundance varied by four orders of magnitudes between taxa despite the use of similar amounts of biomass. Our metabarcoding approach yielded reliable results for high-throughput assessments. However, the results indicated that primer efficiency is highly species-specific, which would prevent straightforward assessments of species abundance and biomass in a sample. Thus, PCR-based metabarcoding assessments of biodiversity should rely on presence-absence metrics.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Taxonomy in a changing world: Seeking solutions for a science in crisis
    Agnarsson, Ingi
    Kuntner, Matjaz
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2007, 56 (03) : 531 - 539
  • [2] [Anonymous], METHODISCHES HDB FLI
  • [3] [Anonymous], EC HUM WELL BEING SY
  • [4] Environmental Status Assessment Using DNA Metabarcoding: Towards a Genetics Based Marine Biotic Index (gAMBI)
    Aylagas, Eva
    Borja, Angel
    Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, Naiara
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [5] Molecular systematics - Counting angels with DNA
    Blaxter, M
    [J]. NATURE, 2003, 421 (6919) : 122 - 124
  • [6] Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring
    Bohmann, Kristine
    Evans, Alice
    Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
    Carvalho, Gary R.
    Creer, Simon
    Knapp, Michael
    Yu, Douglas W.
    de Bruyn, Mark
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2014, 29 (06) : 358 - 367
  • [7] BLAST plus : architecture and applications
    Camacho, Christiam
    Coulouris, George
    Avagyan, Vahram
    Ma, Ning
    Papadopoulos, Jason
    Bealer, Kevin
    Madden, Thomas L.
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 10
  • [8] QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
    Caporaso, J. Gregory
    Kuczynski, Justin
    Stombaugh, Jesse
    Bittinger, Kyle
    Bushman, Frederic D.
    Costello, Elizabeth K.
    Fierer, Noah
    Pena, Antonio Gonzalez
    Goodrich, Julia K.
    Gordon, Jeffrey I.
    Huttley, Gavin A.
    Kelley, Scott T.
    Knights, Dan
    Koenig, Jeremy E.
    Ley, Ruth E.
    Lozupone, Catherine A.
    McDonald, Daniel
    Muegge, Brian D.
    Pirrung, Meg
    Reeder, Jens
    Sevinsky, Joel R.
    Tumbaugh, Peter J.
    Walters, William A.
    Widmann, Jeremy
    Yatsunenko, Tanya
    Zaneveld, Jesse
    Knight, Rob
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2010, 7 (05) : 335 - 336
  • [9] Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
    Cardinale, Bradley J.
    Duffy, J. Emmett
    Gonzalez, Andrew
    Hooper, David U.
    Perrings, Charles
    Venail, Patrick
    Narwani, Anita
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Tilman, David
    Wardle, David A.
    Kinzig, Ann P.
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    Loreau, Michel
    Grace, James B.
    Larigauderie, Anne
    Srivastava, Diane S.
    Naeem, Shahid
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 486 (7401) : 59 - 67
  • [10] Environmental monitoring using next generation sequencing: rapid identification of macroinvertebrate bioindicator species
    Carew, Melissa E.
    Pettigrove, Vincent J.
    Metzeling, Leon
    Hoffmann, Ary A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ZOOLOGY, 2013, 10