Electric Field Encephalography as a Tool for Functional Brain Research: A Modeling Study

被引:9
作者
Petrov, Yury [1 ]
Sridhar, Srinivas [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
EEG; CONDUCTIVITY; MEG; TISSUE; HEAD; LOCALIZATION; LAPLACIANS; SIMULATION; ANISOTROPY; EEG/MEG;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0067692
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We introduce the notion of Electric Field Encephalography (EFEG) based on measuring electric fields of the brain and demonstrate, using computer modeling, that given the appropriate electric field sensors this technique may have significant advantages over the current EEG technique. Unlike EEG, EFEG can be used to measure brain activity in a contactless and reference-free manner at significant distances from the head surface. Principal component analysis using simulated cortical sources demonstrated that electric field sensors positioned 3 cm away from the scalp and characterized by the same signal-to-noise ratio as EEG sensors provided the same number of uncorrelated signals as scalp EEG. When positioned on the scalp, EFEG sensors provided 2-3 times more uncorrelated signals. This significant increase in the number of uncorrelated signals can be used for more accurate assessment of brain states for non-invasive brain-computer interfaces and neurofeedback applications. It also may lead to major improvements in source localization precision. Source localization simulations for the spherical and Boundary Element Method (BEM) head models demonstrated that the localization errors are reduced two-fold when using electric fields instead of electric potentials. We have identified several techniques that could be adapted for the measurement of the electric field vector required for EFEG and anticipate that this study will stimulate new experimental approaches to utilize this new tool for functional brain research.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to Source Orientation [J].
Ahlfors, Seppo P. ;
Han, Jooman ;
Belliveau, John W. ;
Haemaelaeinen, Matti S. .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2010, 23 (03) :227-232
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Electric fields of the brain: The neurophysics of eeg
[3]   Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information [J].
Baillet, S ;
Garnero, L ;
Marin, G ;
Hugonin, JP .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 46 (05) :522-534
[4]   Cortical surface-based analysis - I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction [J].
Dale, AM ;
Fischl, B ;
Sereno, MI .
NEUROIMAGE, 1999, 9 (02) :179-194
[5]   Modeling of the Human Skull in EEG Source Analysis [J].
Dannhauer, Moritz ;
Lanfer, Benjamin ;
Wolters, Carsten H. ;
Knoesche, Thomas R. .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2011, 32 (09) :1383-1399
[6]  
Gibson R. S., 2009, THESIS B YOUNG U
[7]   Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study [J].
Guellmar, Daniel ;
Haueisen, Jens ;
Reichenbach, Juergen R. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 51 (01) :145-163
[8]   Modeling and experimental electro-optic response of dielectric lithium niobate waveguides used as electric field sensors [J].
Gutierrez-Martinez, C. ;
Santos-Aguilar, J. ;
Ochoa-Valiente, R. ;
Santiago-Bernal, M. ;
Morales-Diaz, A. .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 22 (03)
[9]   INTERPRETING MAGNETIC-FIELDS OF THE BRAIN - MINIMUM NORM ESTIMATES [J].
HAMALAINEN, MS ;
ILMONIEMI, RJ .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 1994, 32 (01) :35-42
[10]   REALISTIC CONDUCTIVITY GEOMETRY MODEL OF THE HUMAN HEAD FOR INTERPRETATION OF NEUROMAGNETIC DATA [J].
HAMALAINEN, MS ;
SARVAS, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1989, 36 (02) :165-171