Multicenter Experience with Transvenous Lead Extraction of Active Fixation Coronary Sinus Leads

被引:37
|
作者
Maytin, Melanie [1 ]
Carrillo, Roger G. [2 ]
Baltodano, Pablo [2 ]
Schaerf, Raymond H. M. [3 ]
Bongiorni, Maria G. [4 ]
Di Cori, Andrea [4 ]
Curnis, Antonio [5 ]
Cooper, Joshua M. [6 ]
Kennergren, Charles [7 ]
Epstein, Laurence M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Providence St Joseph Med Ctr, Burbank, CA USA
[4] Univ Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Med, Pisa, Italy
[5] Univ Brescia, Spedali Civili, Dept Cardiol, I-25121 Brescia, Italy
[6] Univ Penn, Div Cardiovasc, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2012年 / 35卷 / 06期
关键词
lead extraction; LV pacing; lead management; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03353.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objective: Active fixation coronary sinus (CS) leads limit dislodgement and represent an attractive option to the implanter. Although extraction of passive fixation CS leads is a common and frequently uncomplicated procedure, data regarding extraction of chronically implanted active fixation CS leads are limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing active fixation CS lead extraction at six centers. Patient and procedural characteristics, indications for extraction, use of extraction sheath (ES) assistance, and outcomes are reported. Results: Between January 2009 and February 2011, 12 patients underwent transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of Medtronic StarFix (R) lead (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The cohort was 83% male with mean age 71 +/- 14 years. Average implant duration was 14.2 +/- 5.7 months (2.323.6). All leads but one were removed for infectious indications (67% systemic infection). At the time of explant, the fixation lobes were completely retracted in only one of the 12 cases and ES assistance was required for lead removal in all cases (58% laser, 25% cutting, 25% mechanical, and 25% femoral). The majority of cases required advancement of the sheath into the CS (75.0%) and often into a branch vessel (41.7%). One lead could not be removed transvenously and required surgical lead extraction. There were no major complications. Examination of the leads after extraction frequently revealed significant tissue growth into the fixation lobes. Conclusions: Although TLE of active fixation CS leads can be a safe procedure in select patients and experienced hands, powered sheaths and aggressive techniques are frequently required for successful removal despite relatively short implant durations. This raises significant concern regarding future TLE of active fixation CS leads with longer implant durations. (PACE 2012; 35:641647)
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 647
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Results of transvenous lead extraction of coronary sinus leads in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Starck, Christoph T.
    Caliskan, Etem
    Klein, Holger
    Steffel, Jan
    Schoenrath, Felix
    Falk, Volkmar
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (24) : 4703 - 4706
  • [2] The novel active fixation coronary sinus lead: efficacy and safety of transvenous extraction procedure
    Bontempi, Luca
    Vassanelli, Francesca
    Ashofair, Najat
    Inama, Lorenza
    Mariggio, Davide
    Cerini, Manuel
    Curnis, Antonio
    EUROPACE, 2016, 18 (02): : 301 - 303
  • [3] Extraction of chronically implanted coronary sinus leads active fixation vs passive fixation leads
    Crossley, George H.
    Sorrentino, Robert A.
    Exner, Derek V.
    Merliss, Andrew D.
    Tobias, Serge M.
    Martin, David O.
    Augostini, Ralph
    Piccini, Jonathan P.
    Schaerf, Raymond
    Li, Shelby
    Miller, Clayton T.
    Adler, Stuart W.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2016, 13 (06) : 1253 - 1259
  • [4] First experience in quadripolar active fixation coronary sinus lead extraction: a case report
    Guella, Elhosseyn
    Brack, Michael
    Abozguia, Khalid
    Cassidy, Christopher John
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2020, 4 (04) : 1 - 5
  • [5] Removal of Active-Fixation Coronary Sinus Leads Using a Mechanical Rotation Extraction Device
    Kypta, Alexander
    Blessberger, Hermann
    Saleh, Karim
    Hoenig, Simon
    Kammler, Juergen
    Steinwender, Clemens
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (03): : 302 - 305
  • [6] Chronic performance of an active fixation coronary sinus lead
    Crossley, George H.
    Exner, Derek
    Mead, R. Hardwin
    Sorrentino, Robert A.
    Hokanson, Robert
    Li, Shelby
    Adler, Stuart
    HEART RHYTHM, 2010, 7 (04) : 472 - 478
  • [7] Coronary Sinus Lead Extraction
    Cronin, Edmond M.
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2017, 13 (01) : 105 - +
  • [8] Active fixation mechanism complicates coronary sinus lead extraction and limits subsequent reimplantation targets
    Cronin, E. M.
    Ingelmo, C. P.
    Rickard, J.
    Wazni, O. M.
    Martin, D. O.
    Wilkoff, B. L.
    Baranowski, B.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (01) : 81 - 86
  • [9] Active-fixation coronary sinus pacing lead extraction: A hybrid approach
    Curnis, Antonio
    Bontempi, Luca
    Coppola, Giuseppe
    Cerini, Manuel
    Gennaro, Francesca
    Vassanelli, Francesca
    Lipari, Alessandro
    Ashofair, Najat
    Pagnoni, Carlo
    Bisleri, Gianluigi
    Munaretto, Claudio
    Cas, Livio Dei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 156 (03) : E51 - E52
  • [10] A Modified Transvenous Single Mechanical Dilatation Technique to Remove a Chronically Implanted Active-Fixation Coronary Sinus Pacing Lead
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    Di Cori, Andrea
    Zucchelli, Giulio
    Segreti, Luca
    De Lucia, Raffaele
    Paperini, Luca
    Soldati, Ezio
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (07): : E66 - E69