Disclosure of sperm donation: a comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors

被引:32
作者
Freeman, Tabitha [1 ]
Zadeh, Sophie [1 ]
Smith, Venessa [2 ]
Golombok, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Family Res, Free Sch Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RF, England
[2] London Womens Clin, 113-115 Harley St, London W1G 6AP, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
disclosure; donor insemination; identifiable donors; single mothers by choice; solo mothers; OOCYTE DONATION; FOLLOW-UP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ADJUSTMENT; CHILD RELATIONSHIPS; DECISION-MAKING; GAMETE DONATION; SINGLE MOTHERS; INSEMINATION; PARENTS; CONCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.08.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Disclosure of donor conception to children was compared between solo mother and two-parent families with children aged 4-8 years conceived since the removal of donor anonymity in the UK. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 heterosexual solo mothers and 47 heterosexual mothers with partners to investigate their decisions and experiences about identifiable donation and disclosure to their children. No significant difference was found in the proportion of mothers in each family type who had told their children about their donor conception (solo mothers 54.8%; partnered mothers 36.2%). Of those who had not told, a significantly higher proportion of solo mothers than partnered mothers intended to disclose (P < 0.05). Partnered mothers were more likely than solo mothers to feel neutral, ambivalent or negative about having used an identifiable donor (P < 0.05), and were less likely to consider children's knowledge of their genetic origins as extremely important (P < 0.05). These findings are relevant to provision of counselling services as it cannot be assumed that parents will tell their children about their origins or their entitlement to request the identity of their donor at the age of 18 years. Further qualitative research would increase understanding of solo mothers' attitudes towards disclosure. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Reproductive Healthcare Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 600
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DON CONC ETH ASP INF
[2]   Do couples who procreate through sperm donation inform their children? [J].
Araya, R. ;
Rouzier, J. ;
Perrin, J. ;
Carez, S. ;
Saias-Magnan, J. ;
Noizet, A. ;
Grillo, J. -M ;
Metzler-Guillemain, C. .
JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2011, 40 (06) :503-507
[3]   Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes [J].
Baetens, P ;
Devroey, P ;
Camus, M ;
Van Steirteghem, AC ;
Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (02) :476-484
[4]   Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process [J].
Beeson, D. R. ;
Jennings, P. K. ;
Kramer, W. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (09) :2415-2424
[5]   'Daddy ran out of tadpoles': how parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7-year-olds understand [J].
Blake, L. ;
Casey, P. ;
Readings, J. ;
Jadva, V. ;
Golombok, S. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 (10) :2527-2534
[6]  
Blake L, 2014, RELATEDNESS IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: FAMILIES, ORIGINS AND IDENTITIES, P251
[7]   'I Was Quite Amazed': Donor Conception and Parent-Child Relationships from the Child's Perspective [J].
Blake, Lucy ;
Casey, Polly ;
Jadva, Vasanti ;
Golombok, Susan .
CHILDREN & SOCIETY, 2014, 28 (06) :425-437
[8]   Doing the right thing? Single mothers by choice and the struggle for legitimacy [J].
Bock, JD .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 2000, 14 (01) :62-86
[9]   Donor insemination: Dutch parents' opinions about confidentiality and donor anonymity and the emotional adjustment of their children [J].
Brewaeys, A ;
Golombok, S ;
Naaktgeboren, N ;
deBruyn, JK ;
vanHall, EV .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (07) :1591-1597
[10]   Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients' choices [J].
Brewaeys, A ;
de Bruyn, JK ;
Louwe, LA ;
Helmerhorst, FM .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (03) :820-824