Objective calibration of bone conductors using otoacoustic emissions

被引:12
作者
Purcell, D
Kunov, H
Cleghorn, W
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Biomat & Biomed Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00003446-199910000-00001
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To demonstrate a technique for objectively calibrating bone conductors on an individual basis using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Design: Individual calibrations were obtained using DPOAEs recorded from a single ear of 21 normally hearing adults. Validity and robustness of the technique were investigated through subjective phase cancellation measurements and sensitivity analysis. Results: Calibrations obtained using the DPOAE method were well supported by phase cancellation results. Intersession repeatability was good, and manipulation of the DPOAE data showed that the calculated calibration is relatively insensitive to small variations of emission magnitude. Bilateral stimulation through bone conduction did not display an apparent effect on emission magnitude in a single individual, Conclusion: Bone conductors can be accurately calibrated on an individual basis with good repeatability using DPOAEs. The technique is robust and offers an objective, noninvasive calibration method for research and specialized clinical applications. No training and only passive cooperation are required, making the procedure ideal for special groups such as children. A number of limitations will reduce the clinical utility of this technique. Important audiometric frequencies below 1 kHz cannot be tested because of noise, because individuals with significant hearing loss are unlikely to produce sufficient DPOAEs, and because commercial bone conductors typically have poor high-frequency response above 4 kHz.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 392
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f(1)-f(2)) amplitude as a function of f(2)/f(1) frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates [J].
Abdala, C .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 100 (06) :3726-3740
[2]  
*AM NAT STAND I, 1997, S3131987 ANSI
[3]  
*AM NAT STAND I, 1992, S3431992 ANSI
[4]  
Barany E., 1938, ACTA OTOLARYNGOL, VSupplementum 26, P1
[5]   LOUDNESS BALANCE CALIBRATION OF BONE CONDUCTION VIBRATORS [J].
BARRY, SJ ;
VAUGHAN, RB .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1981, 24 (03) :454-459
[6]  
BERANEK LL, 1949, ACOUSTIC MEASUREMENT, P367
[7]  
BONBEKESY G, 1955, J ACOUST SOC AM, V27, P137
[8]   VALIDITY OF BONE CONDUCTION STIMULATED ABR, MLR AND OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS [J].
COLLET, L ;
CHANAL, JM ;
HELLAL, H ;
GARTNER, M ;
MORGON, A .
SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1989, 18 (01) :43-46
[9]   CONTRALATERAL AUDITORY-STIMULATION AND OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS - A REVIEW OF BASIC DATA IN HUMANS [J].
COLLET, L ;
VEUILLET, E ;
MOULIN, A ;
MORLET, T ;
GIRAUD, AL ;
MICHEYL, C ;
CHERYCROZE, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 1994, 28 (4-5) :213-218
[10]   BONE VIBRATOR PLACEMENT AND THE CANCELLATION TECHNIQUE [J].
DEMPSEY, JJ ;
LEVITT, H .
EAR AND HEARING, 1990, 11 (04) :271-281