Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes

被引:132
作者
Kingstone, A
Pratt, J
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychol, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 1999年 / 61卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03207612
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Response time can be delayed if a target stimulus appears at a location or object that was previously cued. This inhibition of return (IOR) phenomenon has been attributed to a delay in activating attentional or motor processes to a previously cued stimulus. Two experiments required subjects to localize or identify a target stimulus. in Experiment 1, the subjects' eyes were not monitored. In Experiment 2, the subjects' eyes were monitored, and the subjects were instructed to either execute or withhold an eye movement to a target stimulus. The results indicated that IOR was always present for location and identification responses, supporting an attentional account of IOR. However, IOR was larger when eye movements were executed, indicating that a motor component can contribute to IOR. Finally, when eye movements were withheld, IOR was larger when a target was presented alone than when it was presented with a distracter, suggesting that IOR is larger for exogenous than for endogenous covert orienting. Together, the data indicate that IOR is composed of both an oculomotor component and an attentional component.
引用
收藏
页码:1046 / 1054
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   INHIBITION OF RETURN - EFFECTS OF ATTENTIONAL CUEING ON EYE-MOVEMENT LATENCIES [J].
ABRAMS, RA ;
DOBKIN, RS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1994, 20 (03) :467-477
[2]   IS POSNER BEAM THE SAME AS TREISMAN GLUE - ON THE RELATION BETWEEN VISUAL ORIENTING AND FEATURE INTEGRATION-THEORY [J].
BRIAND, KA ;
KLEIN, RM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1987, 13 (02) :228-241
[3]   CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL PRECUING OF FORCED-CHOICE DISCRIMINATION [J].
CHEAL, ML ;
LYON, DR .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 43 (04) :859-880
[4]  
CORBETTA M, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P1202
[5]   INHIBITION AND DISINHIBITION OF RETURN - EVIDENCE FROM TEMPORAL-ORDER JUDGMENTS [J].
GIBSON, BS ;
EGETH, H .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 56 (06) :669-680
[6]  
Jonides J., 1981, ATTENTION PERFORM, V9, P187, DOI DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.835
[7]  
KINGSTONE A, 1997, ATTENTION DEV PSYCHO, P263
[8]  
Klein Raymond M., 1994, P113
[9]   Disinhibition of return: Unnecessary and unlikely [J].
Klein, RM ;
Schmidt, WC ;
Muller, HJ .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1998, 60 (05) :862-872
[10]  
KLEIN RM, 1993, EYE MOVEMENTS VISUAL, P46