Field Screening of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) Mutant and Commercial Genotypes for Salt Tolerance

被引:0
|
作者
Cha-Um, Suriyan [1 ]
Chantawong, Satjaporn [2 ]
Mongkolsiriwatana, Chareerat [3 ]
Ashraf, Muhammad [4 ]
Kirdmanee, Chalermpol [1 ]
机构
[1] NSTDA, Natl Ctr Genet Engn & Biotechnol BIOTEC, Khlong Luang 12120, Pathumthani, Thailand
[2] Mitr Phol Co Ltd, Div Mitr Phol Res & Dev, Phukhew 36110, Chaiyaphum, Thailand
[3] Kasetsart Univ, Fac Liberal Arts & Sci, Div Genet, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand
[4] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Fac Sci, Dept Bot, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
关键词
cluster analysis; net photosynthetic rate; sugar qualities; water use efficiency; yield traits; SALINITY; GROWTH; EFFICIENCY; TRANSPORT; WHEAT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Growth and physiological attributes and sugar quality parameters are considered key criteria for screening sugarcane cultivars for salt tolerance. Maximum cane growth and yield were found in a positive check('K88-92') as well as in cv. '(A3)AE1-18' when subjected to salt affected soil. Percent reduction in F-v/F-m, quantum efficiency of PSII (Phi(PSII)) and water use efficiency (WUE) due to salt stress was considerably low in 'K88-92', '(A3)AE1-18' and 'KK3' which was associated with very low salt-induced reduction in net photosynthetic rate and growth characters such as shoot length, number of internodes, and internodal length as well as yield traits In addition, brix, polarlization, fiber, purity and commercial cane sugar (CCS) in '(A18)AE2-15' and '(A3)AE1-18' were well maintained under saline stress. By subjecting the data for various physiological, growth, yield and sugar quality parameters to the Ward's cluster analysis 'K88-92' (positive check), '(A3)AE1-18' and 'KK3' were identified as salt tolerant, whereas '(A11)AE1-114' and 'K97-32' as salt sensitive.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 293
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis and In Vitro Polyethylene Glycol Selection for Drought Tolerance in Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)
    Masoabi, M.
    Lloyd, J.
    Kossmann, J.
    van der Vyver, C.
    SUGAR TECH, 2018, 20 (01) : 50 - 59
  • [42] Ethyl Methanesulfonate Mutagenesis and In Vitro Polyethylene Glycol Selection for Drought Tolerance in Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)
    M. Masoabi
    J. Lloyd
    J. Kossmann
    C. van der Vyver
    Sugar Tech, 2018, 20 : 50 - 59
  • [43] SIMULATION OF DISTANCE BETWEEN FIELD AND REPLENISHMENT PUMP IN MECHANIZED SPRAYING OF SUGARCANE (Saccharum spp.)
    dos Santos, Neisvaldo B.
    ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA, 2018, 38 (05): : 805 - 812
  • [44] Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) response to simulated fallow field residues of metribuzin and sulfometuron
    Miller, DK
    Richard, EP
    Griffin, JL
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 12 (03) : 454 - 457
  • [45] Use of bioreactors for large-scale multiplication of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), energy cane (Saccharum spp.), and related species
    Jorge Alberto da Silva
    Nora Solis-Gracia
    John Jifon
    Silvana Creste Souza
    Kranthi Kiran Mandadi
    In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2020, 56 : 366 - 376
  • [46] Genetic diversity and population structure among 133 elite genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) for use as parents in sugarcane varietal improvement
    Padmanabhan, T. S. Sarath
    Hemaprabha, G.
    3 BIOTECH, 2018, 8 (08)
  • [47] Genetic diversity and population structure among 133 elite genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) for use as parents in sugarcane varietal improvement
    T. S. Sarath Padmanabhan
    G. Hemaprabha
    3 Biotech, 2018, 8
  • [48] Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) response to azafeniden applied preemergence and postemergence
    Viator, BJ
    Griffin, JL
    Ellis, JM
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02) : 444 - 451
  • [49] Identification of a STMS marker for sucrose content in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)
    Lavanya, D. Leena
    Hemaprabha, G.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 2012, 72 (03) : 343 - 348
  • [50] ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FOR SIZING OF SUGARCANE (Saccharum spp.) MECHANIZED HARVESTING
    dos Santos, Neisvaldo B.
    Silva, Rouverson P.
    Gadanha Junior, Casimiro D.
    ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA, 2014, 34 (05): : 945 - 954